Protection Boundary Development in Historical–Cultural Built Environments Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Geographic Information System (GIS)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13114183 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Can Kara (0000-0003-2121-9442, Near East University, corresponding author), Aminreza Iranmanesh (0000-0001-9438-9261, Final International University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 173-173 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-19 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Urban Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2413-8851 • E-ISSN: 2413-8851 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/urbansci9050173 |
| OpenAlex | W4410493751 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 55 |
Contemporary urban environments continuously transform and evolve due to rapid urbanisation and development pressures, putting historical and cultural heritage sites at risk. To cope with this, it is essential to frequently re-evaluate and redefine protective boundaries and strategies for developing them to reflect current and emerging urban patterns. Defining protection boundaries is an inherently complex task consisting of intricate and interrelated spatial, social, and cultural networks and elements. What is more, the data layers used to represent different dimensions of cities are diverse and generated by various sources. In order to make any decision capable of addressing this multifaceted problem, it is essential to employ a thorough decision-making framework capable of accounting for multiple criteria. In this study, a combination of the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) integrated with Geographic Information System (GIS) offers a structured approach to managing the complexities of setting these protective zones. Despite their extensive use in diverse site selection contexts, applying AHP and GIS to determine urban protection boundaries remains underexplored. The method was explored and tested in a case study in North Cyprus. The proposed method systematically includes economic, architectural, environmental, social, and legal data layers, aiming to generate a more comprehensive model for developing protection boundaries tied to multidimensional and contextual complexities, as well as considering rapid urbanisation patterns. The study contributes to the ongoing discourse on heritage preservation and sustainable urban development by providing an evidence-based analytical method for managing the evolving challenges of urban heritage protection. The results indicate that experts see social and environmental factors as the most significant, emphasising the significance of community engagement and ecological considerations in heritage conservation. Additionally, the study highlighted regulatory gaps, particularly in maintaining architectural compatibility within the historical context. These findings underscore the importance of integrating stakeholder perspectives and adjusting local regulations to enhance the resilience and effectiveness of heritage protection strategies
Analytic hierarchy process · Boundary (topology · Cartography · Data science · Geographic information system · Geography · Hierarchy · Operations research · Political science · Process (computing · 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Computer Science · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Engineering · Maritime and Coastal Archaeology · Mathematics
The Historic Urban Landscape
A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development
How to make a decision
The Place-shaping Continuum
Becoming Places
Guidelines from the heritage field for the integration of landscape and heritage planning
Ethno-Religious Coexistence and Plurality in Cyprus under British Rule (1878—1960)
What Actually Is a Heritage Conservation Area? A Management Critique Based on a Systematic Review of New South Wales (Australia) Planning Documents
Delineating protective boundaries using the HUL approach a case study
Heritage values and legal rules
Sustainable adaptive reuse – economic impact of cultural heritage
Developing a decision-making framework within the management of historical cities
A framework of decision-making factors and supporting information for facilitating sustainable site planning in urban renewal projects
Recreational Business District boundary identifying and spatial structure influence in historic area development
Stakeholder collaboration and heritage management
Community Involvement for Sustainable World Heritage Sites
Multi-criteria decision-making for grading the rehabilitation of heritage sites. Application in the historic center of La Habana
Building Destruction
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |