Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Modifying Electoral Authoritarianism. What the 2016 Parliamentary Elections Tell us about the Nature and Resilience of the Putin Regime

Bibliographic Data

ID13117351
AuthorsDavid White (0000-0002-6366-2699, University of Birmingham, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume2
Issue4
Pages482-501
Publication date2017-11-20
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRussian Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2451-8913 • E-ISSN: 2451-8921
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/2451-8921-00204005
OpenAlexW2769412518
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited6

Through a focus on the 2016 Russian parliamentary election, this article seeks to assess the strength of the Putin regime and the nature of the system itself. In contrast to those who have heralded its imminent decline, it is argued that the regime continues to display great resilience, the election providing evidence of the regime’s adaptability and its ability to cope with challenges. The nature of the regime is also questioned. It has become commonplace for scholars to refer to Russia’s political system under the presidency of Vladimir Putin as “electoral authoritarian”. The article examines the function of elections in such systems, with a particular emphasis on the way in which elections provide the regime with legitimacy. The conduct and outcome of the elections not only points to the confidence and resilience of the Putin regime but might also suggest that a declining reliance on elections to sustain the regime may lead to a re-appraisal of the electoral authoritarian model as a compelling conceptualization of the Russian political system

Adaptability · Authoritarianism · Conceptualization · Democracy · Economics · General election · Legitimacy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidency · Psychological resilience · Regime change · Resilience (materials science · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Contextualizing the 2016 State Duma Election

    Derek S Hutcheson•Russian Politics•2017

  • A Chink in the Autocrat’s Armour

    Allison C White•Ethnopolitics•2021

  • The range and limitation of sub-national regime variations under electoral authoritarianism

    Cameron Ross, Петр Панов•Regional & Federal Studies•2018

  • The Rise of Powerful Executives

    Open Access•Irina Khmelko, Oleksii Bruslyk•PS Political Science & Politics•2018

  • Explaining Party Support in the 2016 Russian State Duma Election

    Derek S Hutcheson, I Mcallister•Russian Politics•2017

  • The Role of Precinct Commissions in Electoral Manipulation in Russia

    Max Bader•Russian Politics•2017

  • The autocratic mandate

    Lee Morgenbesser•The Pacific Review•2016

  • Party cartels beyond Western Europe

    Open Access•Derek S Hutcheson•Party Politics•2013

  • The End of the Transition Paradigm

    Open Access•Thomas Carothers•Journal of democracy•2002

  • Elections Without Democracy

    Open Access•Andreas Schedler•Journal of democracy•2002

  • The three pillars of stability

    Johannes Gerschewski•Democratization•2013

Citations per year0.56
Citation span2017 - 2021 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae