Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Measuring quality of life

A system of indicators

Bibliographic Data

ID13119339
AuthorsAygun Guliyeva (0000-0002-8298-2452, Azerbaijan University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume10
Issue4
Pages476-491
Publication date2021-11-22
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomic and Political Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2470-4024 • E-ISSN: 2095-4816
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/20954816.2021.1996939
OpenAlexW3215486647
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited11

In this day and age, improving quality of life (QOL) remains a necessary prerequisite for social progress and the central goal of state policy in many countries worldwide, regardless of their economic development. The aim of this work is to propose a system of indicators able to describe the QOL of the population to the fullest extent possible. The research methodology includes an analysis of modern approaches to explaining the QOL concept and describing its main measurement criteria, as well as a matrix comparison of the fundamental characteristics of well-being. These methods’ application and the subsequently obtained results allow developing the model for the QOL measurement. The system of indicators proposed within this model implies the consideration of both objective and subjective indicators distributed into two blocks for convenience: the Accepted Living Standard (material and environmental indicators) and the Quality of Life Opportunities (individual, cultural, and social indicators). The QOL level is determined by the balance or imbalance between the mean values of these blocks. In such a manner, the study advocates that the modern QOL measurement should consider both objective well-being indicators, collected from the reports of the analysed country’s national statistics service, and subjective indicators characterising the citizens’ perceptions of well-being at the individual level

Business · Economic indicator · Economics · Environmental health · Perception · Performance indicator · Population · Quality (philosophy · Quality of life (healthcare · Risk analysis (engineering · Standard of living · Computer Science · Medicine · Psychology · Quality of Life Measurement · Socio-economic Development and Sustainability · Socioeconomic and Demographic Analysis · Marketing

  • Public Transport Accessibility Level and Public Perceptions

    Open Access•Adelina Camelia Tarko, Marius Matichescu et al.•Urban Science•2026

  • Understanding the digital economy in China

    Terence Tai‐leung Chong, Sizhu Wang et al.•Economic and Political Studies•2023

  • Impact of Monetary Policy on Mortgage Rates in Russia’s Regions

    Open Access•Olga Demidova, Alexander Myasnikov et al.•Economic Policy•2024

  • The Forward Guidance Puzzle and Anchored Inflation Expectations

    Open Access•Olga Demidova, Alexander Myasnikov et al.•Economic Policy•2024

  • Null

    Open Access•null null•Philosophy study•2016

  • Four Decades of the Economics of Happiness

    Open Access•Andrew E Clark•Review of Income and Wealth•2018

  • When Does Economic Growth Improve Life Satisfaction? Multilevel Analysis of the Roles of Social Trust and Income Inequality in 46 Countries, 1981–2012

    Open Access•M Mikucka, Francesco Sarracino et al.•World Development•2017

Citations per year1.33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae