Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Metrological framework for selecting morphological characters to identify species and estimate developmental maturity of forensically significant insect specimens

Bibliographic Data

ID13119633
AuthorsJohn M Midgley (0000-0003-1203-3750, Rhodes University, corresponding author), Martin H Villet (0000-0002-4335-5667, Rhodes University)
Year2020
Volume6
Issue1
Pages75-83
Publication date2020-09-10
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueForensic Sciences Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2471-1411 • E-ISSN: 2096-1790
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/20961790.2020.1794347
PMID34007519
OpenAlexW3086071730
LanguageEN
References cited41

Accurate age estimates of immature necrophagous insects associated with a human or animal body can provide evidence of how long the body has been dead. These estimates are based on species-specific details of the insects' aging processes, and therefore require accurate species identification and developmental stage estimation. Many professionals who produce or use identified organisms as forensic evidence have little training in taxonomy or metrology, and appreciate the availability of formalized principles and standards for biological identification. Taxonomic identifications are usually most readily and economically made using categorical and qualitative morphological characters, but it may be necessary to use less convenient and potentially more ambiguous characters that are continuous and quantitative if two candidate species are closely related, or if identifying developmental stages within a species. Characters should be selected by criteria such as taxonomic specificity and metrological repeatability and relative error . We propose such a hierarchical framework, critique various measurements of immature insects, and suggest some standard approaches to determine the reliability of organismal identifications and measurements in estimating postmortem intervals. Relevant criteria for good characters include high repeatability (including low scope for ambiguity or parallax effects), pronounced discreteness, and small relative error in measurements. These same principles apply to individuation of unique objects in general.Key pointsMetrological rigour can increase in forensic entomology by selecting measurements based on their metrological qualities.Selection of high-quality features for morphological identification of organisms should consider these criteria: (1) pronounced discreteness of features (minimising group overlap or maximizing interval); (2) high repeatability of assessment (such as symmetrical width rather than asymmetrical length); (3) small relative error in measurement (selecting the physically largest continuous rigid feature for measurement).These metrological principles also apply to individuation of unique objects in general

Biology · Evolutionary biology · Identification (biology · Repeatability · Rigour · Species identification · Statistics · Diptera species taxonomy and behavior · Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies · Insect behavior and control techniques · Mathematics · Ecology

  • A brief review of forensically important flesh flies (Diptera

    Open Access•Lipin Ren, Yanjie Shang et al.•Forensic Sciences Research•2018

  • The uses of Chrysomya megacephala (Fabricius, 1794) (Diptera

    Open Access•Rozane Badenhorst, Martin H Villet•Forensic Sciences Research•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae