Trade, security, and authoritarianism
Domestic politics of foreign policy making in China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13120752 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hiroki Takeuchi (0000-0003-4347-5826, Southern Methodist University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 202-225 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2476-1028 • E-ISSN: 2476-1036 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/24761028.2020.1847416 |
| OpenAlex | W3108111635 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 19 |
Could trade bring security and stability to international relations? China has become one of the most important players in the global economy without being democratized. In this article, I present a game-theoretic model in which an authoritarian state would behave more cooperatively in international relations if internationalists are empowered vis-à-vis hardliners in domestic politics. Reformists and internationalists are likely partners. The reformists have a strong incentive to use the free trade agreements’ (FTAs) stipulating domestic regulations as external pressure to advance structural reforms: they see intra-industry trade, enhanced by global value chains (GVCs), as a means to achieve sustainable economic growth. This article breaks down the broader claim that FTAs regulating GVCs-based intra-industry trade are connected to regional security in two steps: first, FTAs empower the reformist-internationalist coalition; and second, the empowered reformist internationalists make the state’s behavior more cooperative in the international sphere. The model’s equilibrium outcome implies that the FTAs that require the signatories to be committed to domestic economic reforms will promote international cooperation and strengthen regional security by empowering people who favor reform and internationalism in each state’s domestic politics. This means, if an authoritarian state is involved in the global economy and benefits from international economic transactions, like China does, then concluding and spreading FTAs requiring domestic economic reforms would be more effective policy to bring security and stability than promoting democratic transitions
Authoritarianism · China · Democracy · Economic system · Economics · Free trade · International relations · International trade · Political economy · Political science · Politics · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Global trade and economics · International Development and Aid · Law
Allies of the State
The Belt Road and Beyond
The Invisible Hand of Peace
The Great Convergence
After Hegemony
Liberal Leviathan
Capitalism without Democracy
Unlikely Partners
The Tragedy of Great Power Politics
Accepting Authoritarianism
The Politics of Risking Peace
To Join or Not to Join? State Ownership, Commercial Interests, and China's Belt and Road Initiative
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |