Grassroots involvement on Global South policy narratives and deliberative action on climate change loss and damage
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13122003 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Noe John Joseph E Sacramento (0000-0002-7099-7673, University of the Philippines Cebu, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 156-168 |
| Publication date | 2023-08-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Administration and Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2517-679X • E-ISSN: 1727-2645 |
| Publisher | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/pap-12-2022-0146 |
| OpenAlex | W4385773020 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 40 |
Purpose This paper investigates how power and narratives among actors relate to the process of agenda-setting and deliberation in the context of climate change loss and damage. The focus is to understand how grassroots voices manifest their concerns on intensifying economic and non-economic impacts of climate change loss and damage which affect them. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on the case of the Southeast Asia climate change loss and damage workshop in Bohol, Philippines in August 2022. It utilizes lesson drawing as a critical approach by thematic analysis in making sense of the data gathered from the perspectives of participant observers and facilitators. Findings There are different levels of power and dominant narratives actors in a deliberative process propel in taking a stance over a particular issue towards agenda-setting and policy framing. The power and narratives help actors to maintain and emphasize their position, exercise authority, and to some point, suppress weak voices. Narratives associated with emotions, sentiments, ideologies, and value systems of the grassroots, community leaders, and climate justice movements tend to be devalued by those in a high level of power and authority. Originality/value Techno-authoritarian domination explicitly hampers a genuine grassroots involvement in the policy process, especially towards agenda-setting of immediate concerns about climate change loss and damage which affect the public. Critiquing actors’ power and narratives are productive in identifying and propagating the type of deliberative spaces that speak truth to power
Citizen journalism · Climate change · Deliberation · Framing (construction · Geography · Grassroots · Narrative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Law · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Policy without politics
Vicious Circles
Lost in translation
Low impact development techniques to mitigate the impacts of climate-change-induced urban floods
Introducing the Narrative Policy Framework
Public participation and climate change adaptation
Migration in the UNFCCC Workstream on Loss and Damage
The Narrative Policy Framework
Beyond the deliberative subject? Problems of theory, method and critique in the turn to emotion and affect
Policy deliberation
Lost in the problem
Climate finance governance
Technocratic and deliberative nexus in policy analysis
Framing Climate Change Loss and Damage in UNFCCC Negotiations
Scripting Deliberative Policy-Making
Climate change in a changing world
How to conduct a Narrative Policy Framework study
Bureaucratic politics and the allocation of climate finance
Revisiting deliberative policy analysis
Introduction
How policies become contested
Compensating for Climate Change Loss and Damage
Why and how Narrative Matters in Deliberative Systems
A Narrative Policy Framework
The Most Important Topic Political Scientists Are Not Studying
Understanding Emotions in Policy Studies through Foucault and Deleuze
Superimposition
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |