Sympoietic thinking and Earth System Law
The Earth, its subjects and the law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13129263 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marie-Catherine Petersmann (0000-0001-5665-0211, Tilburg University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 100114-100114 |
| Publication date | 2021-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Earth System Governance (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2589-8116 • E-ISSN: 2589-8116 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.esg.2021.100114 |
| OpenAlex | W3197548695 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 34 |
This article explores what the emerging paradigm of ‘Earth System Law’ suggests in terms of reconfigurations of the Earth, its subjects and the law. Which representations of the Earth and of its subjects does Earth System Law think with? And which human-nonhuman relations do these systemic reconceptualizations translate? While innovative in many regards when contraposed to international environmental law, Earth System Law's central novelty lies in its ‘systems-oriented ontology’. Yet, it is precisely this underpinning that deserves, I argue, more critical attention. While Earth System Law's rendering of the Earth system seems to embrace an ‘autopoietic’ understanding of how life-making and life-sustaining processes are enacted, its proposed functioning of a planetary Earth System Law and the systems approach that underlies it remain elusive. This article unpacks these tenets by suggesting that, instead of looking at the functioning of the Earth through autopoietic lenses, a ‘sympoietic’ view should be preferred to make sense of how life emerges and contingently unfolds on Earth, and leave space for collective modes of being, thinking and acting in the Anthropocene
Anthropocene · Autopoiesis · Earth (classical element · Earth system science · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Novelty · Political science · Underpinning · Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution · Engineering · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Ecology
Courts, climate litigation and the evolution of earth system law
Towards planetary nexus governance in the Anthropocene
Introducing geological wonder
Conceptualising Sustainability as the Pursuit of Life
Seeking ‘Systems’ in Earth System Law
Earth system law
Reimagining international environmental law for the Anthropocene
Specialist environmental courts and tribunals
Earth steward
The Structure of Legal Evolution
A Plural Nomos
Decomposing the Law, Composting the Collectives
Mattering in the Anthropocene
Environmental law and systems theory
Sociocybernetic Paradoxes
Law as an autopoietic system
Law As A Social System
Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance
A Symbiotic View of Life
The emergence and evolution of Earth System Science
What Comes after Entanglement?
Critical zones
A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None
The extinction of rights and the extantion of ghehds
Laws for the Anthropocene
Earth system law
Taming Gaia 2.0
International environmental law as a complex adaptive system
Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Autopoietic Legal Systems
Synergy of systems theory and symbolic interactionism
Ontological difference, anthropological difference, and equal liberty
Earth system governance’ as a crosscutting theme of global change research
Onus Orbis Terrarum
Terrestrial Lessons
Planetary Crises and the Difficulty of Being Modern
The Climate of History in a Planetary Age
Becoming Human
Law and Aesthetics in the Anthropocene
The Anthropocene
Humankind
The geology of mankind? A critique of the Anthropocene narrative
Can Social Systems Be Autopoietic? Assessing Luhmann's Social Theory
Becoming Human
The Mushroom at the End of the World
The asymmetrical anthropocene
Why Gaia is not a God of Totality
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,8 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |