Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A comparison of acute affective responses, physiological measures and training volume between superset and traditional resistance training in untrained adults

Bibliographic Data

ID13130335
AuthorsPer Aslak Myraunet (Vestlandsforsking), Atle Hole Saeterbakken (0000-0002-5592-6551, Vestlandsforsking), Vidar Andersen (0000-0002-3496-8517, Vestlandsforsking)
Year2025
Volume7
Pages1536747-1536747
Publication date2025-01-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367
PublisherFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fspor.2025.1536747
PMID39896990
OpenAlexW4406543306
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited41

The aim of this study was to compare the perceptive responses, physiological measures, training volume and training duration comparing a superset vs. a traditional resistance training session in untrained adults. Thirty adults (29 ± 7 years, 1.72 ± 0.1 m, 77 ± 16 kg) performed one superset resistance training session and one traditional resistance training session in a randomized-crossover design. Both sessions consisted of eight exercises with two sets and a load of ∼10-repetition maximum. The outcomes included number of repetitions, training duration, blood lactate and heart rate in addition to rate of perceived exertion (RPE), rate of perceived discomfort (RPD), session displeasure/pleasure (sPDF) and exercise enjoyment (EES) which were recorded in the middle and post-exercise. Forty-eight hours after the last session the participants reported which session they would prefer as their regular routine if they had to choose. The main findings were that the superset session led to greater RPE compared to the traditional session ( p = 0.012–0.16, d = 0.53–0.54). Further, there was a trend towards greater RPD after the superset session, although not reaching statistical significance ( p = 0.092, d = 0.41). There were no differences for sPDF ( p = 0.404) or EES ( p = 0.829). Furthermore, the superset session demonstrated higher levels of blood lactate levels (18.3%. p < 0.001, d = 0.81) and average heart rate (7.8%, p < 0.001, d = 1.53) compared to the traditional session. The traditional session took 60% longer time ( p < 0.001, d = 6.62), and had 4.6% more repetitions ( p = 0.006, d = 0.54) compared to the superset session. Two out of three participants reported the superset session as their preferred regular training routine. In conclusion, the superset session led to a higher perceived effort and discomfort, higher metabolic stress, took less time, had a lower training volume and was more preferred compared to the traditional session in untrained adults

Biology · Physical medicine and rehabilitation · Physical therapy · Resistance (ecology · Resistance training · Training (meteorology · Volume (thermodynamics · Cardiovascular and exercise physiology · Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control · Medicine · Psychology · Sports Performance and Training

  • Comparison of affective responses between an online and in-person high-intensity functional training session in sports students

    Open Access•Anine Brudeseth, Tom Erik Jorung Solstad et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2026

  • Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen•Statistical Power Analysis for…•2013

  • Can the Affective Response to Exercise Predict Future Motives and Physical Activity Behavior? A Systematic Review of Published Evidence

    Ryan E Rhodes, Andrew Kates•Annals of Behavioral Medicine•2015

  • Quantity and Quality of Exercise for Developing and Maintaining Cardiorespiratory, Musculoskeletal, and Neuromotor Fitness in Apparently Healthy Adults

    Carol Ewing Garber, Bryan Blissmer et al.•Medicine & Science in Sports &…•2011

  • Not What, but How One Feels

    Charles J Hardy, W Jack Rejeski•Journal of Sport and Exercise…•1989

  • Acute affective response to a moderate-intensity exercise stimulus predicts physical activity participation 6 and 12 months later

    Open Access•David M Williams, Shira I Dunsiger et al.•Psychology of Sport and Exercise•2008

  • The Pleasure and Displeasure People Feel When they Exercise at Different Intensities

    Open Access•Panteleimon Ekkekakis, Gaynor Parfitt et al.•Sports Medicine•2011

  • World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour

    Open Access•Francis Bull, Salih S Al-Ansari et al.•British Journal of Sports Medicine•2020

  • A cross-sectional study on the perceived barriers to physical activity and their associations with domain-specific physical activity and sedentary behaviour

    Open Access•Yen Sin Koh, P V AshaRani et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • The forgotten guidelines

    Open Access•Tessa Strain, Claire Fitzsimons et al.•BMC Public Health•2016

  • How do rest-pause and sarcoplasma stimulating training models affect metabolic and psychoaffective responses in bodybuilding athletes compared to traditional training

    Open Access•Gustavo Paula Leite De Almeida, Gustavo A João et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2024

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae