Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Periodization for success—in-season external training loads relative to competition load in American football

Bibliographic Data

ID13130367
AuthorsQuincy Johnson (University of Kansas, corresponding author), Yang Yang (0000-0002-3705-7612, University of Kansas), Dimitrije Cabarkapa (0000-0001-9912-3251, University of Novi Sad), Dayton Sealey (University of Nebraska at Kearney), Shane Stock (University of Nebraska at Kearney), Dalton Gleason (University of Nebraska at Kearney), Clay Frels (University of Nebraska at Kearney), Maximilian Rink (0009-0000-8778-0182, University of Kansas), Andrew C Fry (0000-0001-8171-7684, University of Kansas)
Year2025
Volume7
Pages1662240-1662240
Publication date2025-09-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367
PublisherFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fspor.2025.1662240
PMID41048626
OpenAlexW4414330095
LanguageEN
References cited26

Introduction Despite an exponential development in performance monitoring technologies, the physical performance demands of sport remain an understudied topic in scientific literature. Thus, the primary purpose of this study was to quantify and compare the training loads (TL) of a collegiate American football team between in-season practices and official games by general position group, event type, and to assess the interaction between the two. Methods Twenty-seven NCAA Division-II athletes volunteered to participate in this investigation. In-season TL during 32 practices (categorized as days before game day; GD minus) and 11 conference games were recorded using global positioning system technology. Collected data included total duration, total distance, yards traveled per minute, hard running distance, hard running efforts, 2-dimensional (2D) load, and 3-dimensional (3D) load. Results A factorial analysis of variance revealed significant main effects in TL for event type ( p < 0.001) and position groups ( p < 0.001), and an interaction effect between the two ( p < 0.001). Unique microcyclic characteristics were observed for each measure of interest. Relative to game values (100%), values for training duration (+25% to −12%; GD-4 to GD-1), yards per minute (+15% to −11%), total distance (+37% to −3%), hard running distance (+33% to −7%), hard running efforts (+33% to −12%), 2D-load (+40% to −7%), and 3D-load (+44% to −3%) were significantly greater than game values on distinct days during the week. Discussion These findings can improve the current understanding of practice demands relative to games, which may support more optimal sport-specific periodization approaches within American football

Sports Analytics and Performance · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training

  • The training—injury prevention paradox

    Open Access•Tim J Gabbett•British Journal of Sports Medicine•2016

  • Defining Training and Performance Caliber

    Alannah K A McKay, Trent Stellingwerff et al.•International Journal of Sports…•2022

  • Monitoring Athlete Training Loads

    Pitre C Bourdon, Marco Cardinale et al.•International Journal of Sports…•2017

  • External and internal training load comparison between sided-game drills in professional soccer

    Open Access•Marco Beato, Kevin L De Keijzer et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae