Biomechanical Features of Backstroke to Breaststroke Transition Techniques in Age-Group Swimmers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13130705 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Phornpot Chainok (0000-0003-2605-4181, Universidade do Porto, corresponding author), Karla De Jesus (0000-0002-7710-9843, Universidade Federal do Amazonas), Luís Mourão (0000-0002-7635-2219, Polytechnic Institute of Porto), Pedro Fonseca (0000-0002-4885-4924, Universidade do Porto), Rodrigo Zacca (0000-0003-0494-0000, Universidade do Porto), Ricardo J Fernandes (0000-0002-8023-1604, Universidade do Porto), J Paulo Vilas-Boas (0000-0002-4109-2939, Universidade do Porto) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Pages | 802967-802967 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fspor.2022.802967 |
| PMID | 35359502 |
| OpenAlex | W4221130878 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 22 |
This study aimed to identify the biomechanical features of backstroke to breaststroke transition techniques ( open, somersault, bucket , and crossover ) in age-group swimmers. Eighteen preadolescent swimmers (12.2 ± 0.4 years old and 3–4 Tanner stages) underwent 4 weeks of systematic contextual interference training, comprising 16 sessions (40 min·session −1 ). Soon after, experimental testing was conducted where swimmers randomly performed 12 × 15 m maximal turns (composed of 7.5 m turn-in and 7.5 m turn-out of the wall segments), three in each transition technique. Kinematical, kinetic, and hydrodynamic variables were assessed with a dual-media motion capture system (12 land and 11 underwater cameras), triaxial underwater force plates, and inverse dynamics. Variables were grouped in turn-in (approach and rotation) and turn-out (wall contact, gliding, and pull-out) phases, with factor analysis used to select the variables entering on multiple regressions. For the turn-in phase, 86, 77, 89, and 87% of the variance for open, somersault, bucket , and crossover turning techniques, respectively, was accounted by the 7.5 and 2.5 m times, mean stroke length, and rotation time. For the turn-out phase, first gliding distance and time, second gliding depth, turn-out time, and dominating peak_Z push-off force accounted for 93% in open turn, while wall contact time, first gliding distance, breakout distance and time, turn-out time, dominating peak_Y push-off force, and second gliding drag coefficient accounted for 92% in a somersault turn. The foot plant index, push-off velocity, second gliding distance, and turn-out time accounted for 92% in bucket turn while breakout and turn-out time, non-dominating peak_Y and peak_Z push-off force, first and second gliding drag force and second gliding drag coefficient accounted for 90% in crossover turn, respectively. The findings in this study were novel and provided relevant biomechanical contribution, focusing on the key kinematic–temporal determinant during turn-in, rotation, and push-off efficacy, and the kinetic and hydrodynamic during turn-out, which would lead to improved backstroke to breaststroke transition techniques in 11–13 years-old age-group swimmers
Biology · Group (periodic table · Physical medicine and rehabilitation · Physics · Transition (genetics · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention · Medicine · Psychology · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |