Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Biomechanical Features of Backstroke to Breaststroke Transition Techniques in Age-Group Swimmers

Bibliographic Data

ID13130705
AuthorsPhornpot Chainok (0000-0003-2605-4181, Universidade do Porto, corresponding author), Karla De Jesus (0000-0002-7710-9843, Universidade Federal do Amazonas), Luís Mourão (0000-0002-7635-2219, Polytechnic Institute of Porto), Pedro Fonseca (0000-0002-4885-4924, Universidade do Porto), Rodrigo Zacca (0000-0003-0494-0000, Universidade do Porto), Ricardo J Fernandes (0000-0002-8023-1604, Universidade do Porto), J Paulo Vilas-Boas (0000-0002-4109-2939, Universidade do Porto)
Year2022
Volume4
Pages802967-802967
Publication date2022-03-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367
PublisherFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fspor.2022.802967
PMID35359502
OpenAlexW4221130878
LanguageEN
References cited22

This study aimed to identify the biomechanical features of backstroke to breaststroke transition techniques ( open, somersault, bucket , and crossover ) in age-group swimmers. Eighteen preadolescent swimmers (12.2 ± 0.4 years old and 3–4 Tanner stages) underwent 4 weeks of systematic contextual interference training, comprising 16 sessions (40 min·session −1 ). Soon after, experimental testing was conducted where swimmers randomly performed 12 × 15 m maximal turns (composed of 7.5 m turn-in and 7.5 m turn-out of the wall segments), three in each transition technique. Kinematical, kinetic, and hydrodynamic variables were assessed with a dual-media motion capture system (12 land and 11 underwater cameras), triaxial underwater force plates, and inverse dynamics. Variables were grouped in turn-in (approach and rotation) and turn-out (wall contact, gliding, and pull-out) phases, with factor analysis used to select the variables entering on multiple regressions. For the turn-in phase, 86, 77, 89, and 87% of the variance for open, somersault, bucket , and crossover turning techniques, respectively, was accounted by the 7.5 and 2.5 m times, mean stroke length, and rotation time. For the turn-out phase, first gliding distance and time, second gliding depth, turn-out time, and dominating peak_Z push-off force accounted for 93% in open turn, while wall contact time, first gliding distance, breakout distance and time, turn-out time, dominating peak_Y push-off force, and second gliding drag coefficient accounted for 92% in a somersault turn. The foot plant index, push-off velocity, second gliding distance, and turn-out time accounted for 92% in bucket turn while breakout and turn-out time, non-dominating peak_Y and peak_Z push-off force, first and second gliding drag force and second gliding drag coefficient accounted for 90% in crossover turn, respectively. The findings in this study were novel and provided relevant biomechanical contribution, focusing on the key kinematic–temporal determinant during turn-in, rotation, and push-off efficacy, and the kinetic and hydrodynamic during turn-out, which would lead to improved backstroke to breaststroke transition techniques in 11–13 years-old age-group swimmers

Biology · Group (periodic table · Physical medicine and rehabilitation · Physics · Transition (genetics · Injury Epidemiology and Prevention · Medicine · Psychology · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training

  • Backstroke to Breaststroke Turning Performance in Age-Group Swimmers

    Open Access•Phornpot Chainok, Leandro Machado et al.•International Journal of…•2021

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae