Incline and decline running alters joint moment contributions but not peak support moments in individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and controls
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13131320 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kenneth Harrison (Auburn University), Hillary H Holmes (Auburn University), Eric B Finley (Auburn University), Keven Santa-Maria Guzman (Auburn University), Katherine C Kimbrough (Auburn University), Jaimie A Roper (0000-0002-8760-8881, Auburn University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Pages | 1217783-1217783 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fspor.2023.1217783 |
| PMID | 38046933 |
| OpenAlex | W4388796820 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 50 |
Individuals with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) commonly exhibit altered gait patterns, potentially contributing to an increased risk of osteoarthritis (OA). Joint moment contributions (JMCs) and support moments during incline and decline running are unknown in healthy young adults and individuals with an ACLR. Understanding these conditional joint-level changes could explain the increased incidence of OA that develops in the long term. Therefore, this knowledge may provide insight into the rehabilitation and prevention of OA development. We aimed to identify the interlimb and between-group differences in peak support moments and subsequent peak ankle, knee, and hip JMCs between individuals with an ACLR and matched controls during different sloped running conditions. A total of 17 individuals with unilateral ACLR and 17 healthy individuals who were matched based on sex, height, and mass participated in this study. The participants ran on an instrumented treadmill at an incline of 4°, decline of 4°, incline of 10°, and decline of 10°. The last 10 strides of each condition were used to compare the whole-stance phase support moments and JMCs between limbs, ACLR, and control groups and across conditions. No differences in JMCs were identified between limbs or between the ACLR and healthy control groups across all conditions. Support moments did not change among the different sloped conditions, but JMCs significantly changed. Specifically, ankle and knee JMCs decreased and increased by 30% and 33% from an incline of 10° to a decline of 10° running. Here, the lower extremities can redistribute mechanics across the ankle, knee, and hip while maintaining consistent support moments during incline and decline running. Our data provide evidence that those with an ACLR do not exhibit significant alterations in joint contributions while running on sloped conditions compared to the matched controls. Our findings inform future research interested in understanding the relationship between sloped running mechanics and the incidence of deleterious acute or chronic problems in people with an ACLR
Ankle · Anterior cruciate ligament · Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction · Gait · Knee Joint · Osteoarthritis · Physical medicine and rehabilitation · Physical therapy · Treadmill · Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques · Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies · Medicine · Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Rehabilitation · Surgery
| Highly cited | No |
|---|