Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Comparative Analysis of Mechanized Farming Policies and Agriculture Green Development in Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and China

Towards Sustainable Agricultural Productivity in the 21st Century

Bibliographic Data

ID13132572
AuthorsYusuff Jelili Amuda (0000-0003-2150-2539, Prince Sultan University, corresponding author), Abdulqader Al-Khateeb (Prince Sultan University)
Year2025
Volume5
Issue5
Pages2561-2588
Publication date2025-05-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Posthumanism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2634-3576 • E-ISSN: 2634-3584
PublisherNobel Press Resources (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.63332/joph.v5i5.1646
OpenAlexW4410224570
LanguageEN
References cited7

Sustainable agricultural productivity is an essential part of sustainable development goals (SDGs). Nigeria, China and Saudi Arabia have been striving to achieve sustainable agricultural productivity. However, less attention is given to comparative analysis concerning the utilization of mechanized farming in boosting agricultural productivity. This study therefore aims at exploring policies for adoption of mechanized farming practices in the aforementioned countries. The methodology employed in this study is content analysis of secondary data as integral part of quantitative research. The findings indicated that in the Nigerian context, mechanized harvesting and threshing, have been shown to significantly reduce food losses, increase yields, and positively impact socio-economic aspects. In China, agricultural mechanization plays a crucial role in reducing fertilizer input through increased agricultural mechanization investment, enhancing efficiency, and reducing pollution while in Saudi Arabia, mechanized farming policies have significantly evolved, driven by government initiatives aimed at fostering agricultural productivity and food security focusing on drought-resistant crops, water-efficient farming, and alternative protein. It is further shown that, comparatively, Nigeria China and Saudi Arabia differ in their agricultural policies, programmes, and structures, impacting their mechanization approaches. It is therefore suggested that policymakers should consider the demand-side factors influencing tractor adoption and the potential effects to drive comprehensive mechanization policies in order to boost agricultural productivity and encourage agripreneurs in the two countries

Agricultural development · Agricultural economics · Agricultural productivity · Agriculture · Agroforestry · Business · China · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Political science · Productivity · Sustainable development · Agriculture Market Analysis Ukraine · Economic and Business Development Strategies · Environmental Science · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy

  • Literature reviews as independent studies

    Open Access•Krau, Matthias Breier et al.•Review of Managerial Science•2022

  • Re-assessment of policy implementation on fish farming in achieving sustainable agribusiness and socio-economic development in southern Nigeria

    Open Access•Raed Bin Sadan, Yusuff Jelili Amuda•Journal of Infrastructure Policy…•2023

  • Underlining factors of women and youths’ immersion in digital entrepreneurship and innovation for the growth of the economy in Nigeria

    Open Access•Yusuff Jelili Amuda, Sarah Alabdulrahman•Journal of Infrastructure Policy…•2023

  • New Global Sustainable Development Agenda

    Open Access•Godwell Nhamo•Sustainable Development•2016

  • Agricultural mechanization and the performance of the local Chinese economy

    Open Access•Baoling Zou, Yudan Chen et al.•Food Policy•2024

  • Wage Growth, Landholding, and Mechanization in Chinese Agriculture

    Open Access•Xiaobing Wang, Futoshi Yamauchi et al.•World Development•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae