Operationalizing mission statements for sustainability through product portfolio and lifecycle management
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13135136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gihan Kodithuwakku (University of Oulu), Janne Härkönen (0000-0003-1058-3898, International School for Social and Business Studies, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Pages | 101762-101762 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sustainable Futures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2666-1888 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.sftr.2026.101762 |
| OpenAlex | W7130836658 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 134 |
Organizations increasingly articulate sustainability commitments in their mission statements, yet frequently struggle to translate these commitments into concrete product portfolio and lifecycle decisions. Prior research has largely examined mission statements as symbolic, communicative, or legitimacy-oriented devices, offering limited explanation of how sustainability intent is operationalized within product-related governance. This study does not argue that mission statements merely include sustainability; rather, it explains how mission statements function as governance mechanisms that transmit, translate, and render sustainability decision-making traceable across product portfolios and lifecycles. Drawing on a PRISMA-informed, concept-driven systematic literature review, we synthesize research at the intersection of mission statements, sustainability, and product management to develop a novel conceptual framework grounded in Product Portfolio Management (PPM) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM). The framework explains how sustainability intent articulated in mission statement components is transmitted into portfolio-level prioritization, translated into lifecycle-level product decisions, and made traceable and measurable through structured product data, product structures, and productization logic. Rather than treating mission statements as symbolic declarations, the framework positions them as an upstream governance layer that connects corporate vision with portfolio governance and lifecycle execution. By clarifying the mechanisms through which mission statements influence sustainable product decisions, this study advances theory on mission-driven sustainability governance and provides a foundation for future empirical testing within PPM and PLM contexts.
Application lifecycle management · Operationalization · Portfolio · Product (mathematics · Product lifecycle · Product management · Sustainability · System lifecycle · Organizational Strategy and Culture · Sustainability in Higher Education · Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Guidelines for Bibliometric‐Systematic Literature Reviews
The Concept of Sustainable Development
Business sustainability
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Literature review as a research methodology
Towards coherence on sustainability in education
Employee Green Behavior as the Core of Environmentally Sustainable Organizations
Employee roles in sustainability transformation processes
A great start? Sustainability mission statements affect consumer behavior
Strategic priorities of corporate policy in lithium mining
Workplace spirituality and organization sustainability
Sustainable investing and financing for sustainable development
Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact — The role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull
The diffusion of environmental product and service innovations
Three pillars of sustainability
Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |