Mineral diplomacy in Greenland
Learning from US-European history of engagement at the Ivittuut cryolite mine
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13136909 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Nolan Hale (0000-0002-6486-6888, United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and Health, corresponding author), Saleem H Ali (0000-0003-0961-4327, corresponding author), Saleem Ali (0000-0002-2943-9557, United Nations University Institute for Water, Environment, and Health, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-21 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2673-3145 • E-ISSN: 2673-3145 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpos.2025.1584988 |
| OpenAlex | W4413368722 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 40 |
Growing extractive and geopolitical interest in Greenland is leading to a confluence of threats and opportunities for communities in determining their future economic development pathways. This paper investigates the diplomatic history of the Ivittuut cryolite mine in Southwest Greenland as part of a larger participatory mapping project focused on interviewing stakeholders in the Arsuk fjord on future development pathways in the Ivittuut region. Ivittuut was a key strategic outpost supporting U.S and European cooperation during World War II. In particular, we define the political process of mineral diplomacy and how cryolite was at the heart of US-European diplomacy in Greenland and how minerals could potentially again be a source of cooperation rather than conflict. Greenland can be a frontline for mineral diplomacy, bridging interests between Europe and the US but key to moving forward with such a process requires critical reflection of who was excluded and included in previous mining engagements. Mineral diplomacy today often reflects colonial extractive pressures and military strategic interests, but we argue that political geology frameworks must be included to ensure that mineral diplomacy processes foster long-term sustainable mineral investment while ensuring local communities and Greenlandic values are protected and included in throughout the process
Archaeology · Cryolite · Diplomacy · Geochemistry · Mineral · Norwegian · Political science · Politics · Arctic and Russian Policy Studies · Chemistry · History · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Mining and Resource Management · Geology · Oceanography
The Shaping of Greenland’s Resource Spaces
Foucault and Geometrics
Climate, Society and Subsurface Politics in Greenland
Greenland in Arctic Security
Resources, Social and Cultural Sustainabilities in the Arctic
Greenland and the geopolitics of critical minerals
Enacting the substrata
Gravel grabs
Necessary, but not sufficient
Decolonizing Geology
Stories, emotions, partnerships and the quest for stable relationships in the Greenlandic mining sector
Mineral riches
Emotions, finances and independence. Uranium as a “happy object” in the Greenlandic debate on secession from Denmark
Ivigtut Cryolite and Modern Greenland
Producing vertical territory
Secure the volume
Challenging Tourism Landscapes of Southwest Greenland
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |