Crowds, leaders, and epidemic psychosis

The relationship between crowd psychology and elite theory and its contemporary relevance

Bibliographic Data

ID13137285
AuthorsGiovanni Damele (0000-0001-6441-8850, University of Lisbon, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume4
Publication date2022-11-10
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2673-3145 • E-ISSN: 2673-3145
PublisherFrontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fpos.2022.1009181
OpenAlexW4308867897
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited10

The influence of the authors of the so-called “crowd psychology” on the conventional interpretation of the “irrationality” of the masses in political life has been widely recognized. More recently, Ernesto Laclau has underlined the influence of this tradition on the liberal-democratic views on direct, mass democracy. This conventional interpretation may be reconstructed starting from different intellectual traditions: crowd psychology, properly speaking, its complementary, the “classical” elite theory, and the influence of the positivist analysis of the “criminal” and “psychopathological” behaviors of the masses. However, this influence, far from being confined to the liberal distaste for mass democracy, has been relevant not only for the fascist regimes of the 20th century but also for the contemporary right-wing populist interpretation of the role of the masses in political life, in spite of its purported antielitism

Crowd psychology · Crowds · Democracy · Elite · Epistemology · Interpretation (philosophy · Irrationality · Judgement · Political psychology · Political science · Politics · Positivism · Relevance (law · Social science · Sociology · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access