Relational integration/assimilation? A critical dialog with postcolonial and mainstream perspectives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13137366 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ivan Polynin (Tallinn University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2673-3145 • E-ISSN: 2673-3145 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpos.2024.1493637 |
| OpenAlex | W4405763781 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 29 |
Mainstream studies on integration and assimilation, epitomized by scholars like Richard Alba and Nancy Foner, tend to equate the terms, describing them as processes in which migrants lose their ethnic salience and gradually become barely distinguishable from the white majority. Postcolonial critiques, most notably from Willem Schinkel and Adrian Favell, challenge these views labeling them as methodological nationalism that allegedly perpetuates racial biases and reduces migrants’ agency. Ultimately Schinkel calls for deconstruction of the entire field of migration studies, while Favell advocates for separating integration from the logic of nation state. To rebuild a once-failed dialog between these influential but divergent perspectives, this article utilizes Klarenbeek’s relational integration theory, which argues in favor of balancing egalitarian social relations between majorities and minorities over one-directional integration models that assign migrants the role of passive recipients. Using Klarenbeek’s framework, I offer a critical perspective on both the mainstream tendency to problematize migrants and the radical deconstruction of integration suggested by postcolonial theorists. I argue that both mainstream and postcolonial scholars should move away from methodological whiteness, acknowledge the conceptual distinction between assimilation and integration, and incorporate insights from acculturation theories to foster a much-needed egalitarian dialog between their competing approaches
Assimilation (phonology · Deconstruction (building · Dialog box · Epistemology · Linguistics · Mainstream · Political science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Philosophy · Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
The Oxford Handbook of Acculturation and Health
Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany
Strangers No More
Patching identity. How Russian language media in Estonia reconstitutes our understanding of citizenship
Integration
Against ‘immigrant integration’
Relational integration
Super-diversity vs. assimilation
Whiteness Just Isn’t Enough
Competing frames of immigrant integration in the EU
Talking about Integration
Immigration, Acculturation, and Adaptation
The integration hypothesis
Just like the USA? Critical notes on Alba and Foner’s cross-Atlantic research agenda
Culture’s role in assimilation and integration
Imagined communities
Integration
Re-Envisioning Immigrant Integration
Reinventing Urban Citizenship
Relational integration
Becoming white or becoming mainstream
Assimilation and integration in the twenty-first century
Challenging the Muslimification of Muslims in research on 'liberal democratic values
The Integration Nation
To decolonize migration studies means to dismantle it. On Adrian Favell's The Integration Nation and question-ability
Strangers No More
"We Never Say We Are Integrating People!" Interpretative Repertoires of Integration Among Local Stakeholders in Sweden
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |