Institutional determinants of smart government adoption
Evidence from Thai public sector organizations
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 13137644 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Panitee Karnsomdee (0000-0002-4551-8239, Kasetsart University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2026 |
| Volumen | 8 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2026-03-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Frontiers in Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2673-3145 • E-ISSN: 2673-3145 |
| Editorial | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpos.2026.1732138 |
| OpenAlex | W7135047799 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 59 |
This study examines the determinants of smart government systems adoption among government officials in Thailand by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Employing a quantitative research design, data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered to 450 public sector officials with prior experience in smart government services. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were used to assess factors influencing adoption behavior. The results indicate that managerial support, incentives, trust, security concerns, and information and communication technology (ICT) strategy significantly affect smart government adoption, although their relative influences differ. Drawing on TAM and UTAUT, the findings emphasize the roles of perceived usefulness, facilitating conditions, and institutional trust in shaping technology acceptance within the public sector context. This study contributes theoretically by extending TAM–UTAUT integration to the smart government domain and highlighting the importance of organizational and trust-related factors beyond individual-level perceptions. Empirically, it provides evidence from a developing-country public sector setting, focusing on government officials as both system implementers and end-users. Practically, the findings offer policy-relevant insights to support effective smart government implementation, inter-organizational collaboration, and digital service delivery
E-Government · Government (linguistics · Government sector · Information technology · Public sector · Public service · Service (business · Technology Acceptance Model · E-Government and Public Services · Smart Cities and Technologies · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Regression Diagnostics
Digital government and public management research
Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT)
The theory of planned behavior
User Acceptance of Information Technology
Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
User Acceptance of Computer Technology
Digitally-induced change in the public sector
Exploring artificial intelligence adoption in public organizations
Analysis of IoT adoption for vegetable crop cultivation
Understanding E-participation adoption
Cybersecurity in local governments
The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) in Higher Education
Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital government success
An integrative public IoT framework for smart government
Assessing behavioral data science privacy issues in government artificial intelligence deployment
IoT and AI for Smart Government
Adoption of open government data among government agencies
Exploring the management of multi-sectoral cybersecurity information-sharing networks
Artificial intelligence in public services
Assessing information security risks in the cloud
Can government’s presence on social media stimulate citizens’ online political participation? Investigating the influence of transparency, trust, and responsiveness
Using diffusion of innovation theory and sentiment analysis to analyze attitudes toward driving adoption by Saudi women
E-Government Services Adoption
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 1 |