Tort, theology, and the colonial mind
Rethinking the ‘act of god’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13137884 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Apoorva Misra (Alliance University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-16 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2673-3145 • E-ISSN: 2673-3145 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpos.2025.1639529 |
| OpenAlex | W7124423231 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 42 |
What does it mean to attribute a flood, a landslide, or a gas leak to an “Act of God”? The question appears legally sound, conceptually coherent, and culturally neutral. We question this neutrality. This paper examines the doctrine of “Act of God” not as a universal legal category but as a concept with Christian-European origins that was later secularized and widely adopted, sometimes by colonial transplantation and sometimes by selective legal borrowing. That the doctrine of “Act of God” today appears self-evident, even in societies where neither “God” nor “religion” exist as native categories, is not evidence of universal agreement, but of a significant transformation in how legal systems reason about misfortune. This paper traces how tortious liability and disaster jurisprudence, as they travel across legal cultures, carry with them a theological residue that modern law has neither shed nor acknowledged. That non-European societies today either mimic these categories or resist them by asserting equivalence does not constitute decolonization. The solution, therefore, must begin not with better laws, but with better questions, questions that emerge from within the conceptual worlds of the societies being governed. Methodologically, this is a conceptual-historical and comparative jurisprudence analysis; no empirical data are used
Colonialism · Denial · Doctrine · Jurisprudence · Legal doctrine · Legal pluralism · Secularization · Environmental law and policy · Religious Freedom and Discrimination · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Religious Nationalism and the Coronavirus Pandemic
The Passivity-Responsiveness Continuum in the disaster preparedness and mitigation process
From Fukoku Kyohei to Fu-Guo-Qiang-Bing
The cultural evolution of witchcraft beliefs
Who owns the future? AI, digital sovereignty, and the politics of knowledge
Colonialism and Its Knowledges
The notion of dyadic morality explains the logic of Zande witchcraft
An exploration of legal pluralism, power and custom in South Africa. A conversation with Aninka Claassens
Indigenous beliefs and customs, the South African criminal law, and human rights
Against the universality of categories
The Rise of China and Evolving Defense Cooperation between India and Japan
At the intersection of disaster risk and religion
Religious Nationalism, Christianisation and Institutionalisation of Indigenous Faiths in Contemporary Arunachal Pradesh, India
Disaster, Heaven, and Political Responsibility
Shaking Legitimacy
The Mandate of Heaven and Performance Legitimation in Historical and Contemporary China
| Highly cited | No |
|---|