Institutional Responsibility is Prior to Personal Responsibility in a Pandemic
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13600028 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ben Davies (0000-0003-4612-7894, Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, corresponding author), Julian Savulescu (0000-0003-1691-6403, Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 215-234 |
| Publication date | 2022-01-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Value Inquiry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-5363 • E-ISSN: 1573-0492 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10790-021-09876-0 |
| PMID | 35001972 |
| OpenAlex | W4206444231 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 41 |
On 26 January 2021, while announcing that the country had reached the mark of 100,000 deaths within 28 days of COVID-19, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson said that he took “full responsibility for everything that the Government has done” as part of British efforts to tackle the pandemic. The force of this statement was undermined, however, by what followed: What I can tell you is that we truly did everything we could, and continue to do everything that we can, to minimise loss of life and to minimise suffering... Taking these sentiments together, it was hard to avoid the conclusion that the government took responsibility only for doing everything right. Such an admission of responsibility, accommodating no admission of error or wrongdoing, is not really about responsibility at all. Indeed, the UK’s pandemic response has been marked from its earliest days by a shifting of focus from institutional responsibility to personal responsibility for individual UK residents. This paper explores the relationship between these two sites of responsibility—the institutional and the personal—in the context of the sort of pandemic that is ongoing as we write. Section 2 offers some initial definitions and discussions of key terms. Section 3 outlines how these two ideas interact in principle during such emergencies. Section 4 turns to the ‘non-ideal’ implications for personal responsibility of failures of institutional responsibility. While our focus is on the specific context with which we are most familiar, the UK governmental approach, where appropriate we also include examples from other states
Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Epistemology · International law · International political economy · Law and economics · Moral responsibility · Ontology · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Public international law · Public relations · Responsibility to Protect · Social responsibility · Sociology · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · Law · Medicine · Philosophy
Responsibility and Control
Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy among ethnic minority groups
Learning from the Covid-19 crisis
Occupation and risk of severe Covid-19
Physical distancing interventions and incidence of coronavirus disease 2019
What Is the Point of Equality?
Putting Fairness in Its Place
Role Responsibility
Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory
British government communication during the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic
StayHomeForGrandma – Towards an analysis of intergenerational solidarity and responsibility in the coronavirus pandemic
What healthcare professionals owe us
Good reasons to vaccinate
Eating meat and not vaccinating
Structural Injustice and Massively Shared Obligations
Taking Risks, Assessing Responsibility
International Aid
Quarantine, isolation and the duty of easy rescue in public health
Pandemic preparedness and cooperative justice
The UK government’s Covid-19 policy
Doing more than one’s fair share
Democracy Requires Organized Collective Power
Stepping in for the Polluters? Climate Justice under Partial Compliance
Government Communications, Political Trust and Compliant Social Behaviour
Covid‐19 and the Blunders of our Governments
Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |