Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Network of Law Reviews

Citation Cartels, Scientific Communities, and Journal Rankings

Bibliographic Data

ID13618398
AuthorsOren Pérez (0000-0003-4061-697X, corresponding author), Judit Bar‐Ilan (0000-0002-8796-5248), Reuven Cohen (0000-0001-8788-2189), Nir Schreiber (0000-0002-1774-2209, Bar-Ilan University)
Year2019
Volume82
Issue2
Pages240-268
Publication date2019-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-7961 • E-ISSN: 1468-2230
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1468-2230.12405
OpenAlexW2888890840
LanguageEN
Citations received7

Research evaluation is increasingly influenced by quantitative data. We focus on the influential Web of Science Journal Citation Reports (JCR) ranking of law journals and critically assess its methodology. In particular, we consider the existence and impact of a tacit citation cartel between US law reviews. A study of 45 US student‐edited (SE) and 45 peer‐reviewed (PR) journals included in the category of Law in the JCR revealed that PR and SE journals are more inclined to cite members of their own class and that this phenomenon is more pronounced in SE generalist journals, reflecting tacit cartelistic behavior generated by deeply entrenched institutional practices. Because US SE journals produce more citations than PR journals, the fact that their citations are directed almost exclusively to SE journals elevates their scores and distorts the journals' ranking and can consequently undermine the flow and creation of ideas. We discuss policy measures that can counter the adverse effects of this situation

Cartel · Citation · Citation impact · Economics · Epistemology · Incentive · Information retrieval · Journal ranking · Knowledge management · Phenomenon · Political science · Ranking (information retrieval · Sociology · Tacit knowledge · Computer Science · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal Education and Practice Innovations

  • What shall I compare thee to? Legal journals, impact, citation and peer rankings

    Open Access•Janja Hojnik•Legal Studies•2021

  • Intelligent recognition of high-quality academic papers

    Open Access•Xiaobo Tang, Xin Du et al.•Scientometrics•2024

  • The rise of hyperprolific authors in computer science

    Open Access•Edré Moreira, Wagner Meira et al.•Scientometrics•2023

  • The Journal Impact Factor Might Be Useful But, for What, Precisely

    Open Access•Melissa Vergara-Fernández•OEconomia•2021

  • Citation Ethics

    Open Access•Samuel V Bruton, Alicia L Macchione et al.•Journal of Academic Ethics•2024

  • Psychology and Wikipedia

    Open Access•Natalia Banasik-Jemielniak, Dariusz Jemielniak et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2021

  • Ranking philosophy journals

    Open Access•Boudewijn De Bruin•Synthese•2023

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1,4
Citation span2021 - 2024 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae