Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Preliminary Study of a Scale Measuring Depression and Somatic Symptoms

Bibliographic Data

ID13651545
AuthorsChing‐I Hung (0000-0002-0466-5670, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital), Ching-I Hung (Department of Psychiatry, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Chang-Gung University School of Medicine), Yi‐Jen Su (0000-0001-7622-7269, National Taiwan University), Yi-Jen Su (National Taiwan University), Li‐Jen Weng (0000-0002-5822-4029, National Taiwan University), Li-Jen Weng (National Taiwan University), Chia-Yih Liu (0000-0002-7250-0720, Department of Psychiatry, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Chang-Gung University School of Medicine, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume99
Issue2
Pages379-389
Publication date2006-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2466/pr0.99.2.379-389
PMID17153806
OpenAlexW1981351240
LanguageEN
References cited21

This description concerns the development of a scale measuring depression and somatic symptoms and the selection of its items for a Taiwanese sample. 102 Taiwanese outpatients (28 men, 74 women) with major depressive disorder completed a 44-item preliminary scale. All had experienced a major depressive episode but had not been treated by antidepressants within the prior two weeks. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was administered to evaluate the validity of the Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale (DSSS). Items, 12 for the Depression Subscale and 10 for the Somatic Subscale, were selected for the Depression and Somatic Symptoms Scale according to their frequency and their association with rated severity of depression and clinical practices. The mean Hamilton Depression score was 23.9 (SD = 5.2) versus 38.4 (SD = 11.3) for the total DSSS; means for the Depression subscale were 23.5 +/- 6.0 and the Somatic subscale 14.9 +/- 6.8. Cronbach alpha was .88 for the total DSSS, .78 for the Depression subscale, and .86 for the Somatic subscale. The Pearson correlation coefficient for the two scales was .59 (p <.01). The new scale had adequate internal consistency reliability and convergent validity. Much study is required to assess its structure, item characteristics, and in judging its applicability and limitations, and sensitivity to cultural differences in clinical settings

Convergent validity · Cronbach's alpha · Depression (economics · Developmental psychology · Internal consistency · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Rating scale · Scale (ratio · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Clinical Psychology · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology · Treatment of Major Depression

  • A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to Change

    Open Access•Stuart A Montgomery, Stuart Montgomery et al.•The British Journal of Psychiatry•1979

  • Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness

    Open Access•MAX HAMILTON•British Journal of Social and…•1967

  • The Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL)

    Open Access•Leonard R DeRogatis, Ronald S Lipman et al.•Systems Research and Behavioral…•1974

  • The PHQ-15

    Kurt Kroenke, Robert L Spitzer et al.•Psychosomatic Medicine•2002

  • Impact of Pain on Depression Treatment Response in Primary Care

    Matthew J Bair, R L Robinson et al.•Psychosomatic Medicine•2004

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae