Criterion Validity of the Cognitive Slippage and Schizotypal Ambivalence Scales
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13651929 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gwenolé Loas (0000-0003-1719-916X, Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Pinel, University of Picardie, Amiens, France, corresponding author), Hajer Dimassi (Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Pinel, University of Picardie, Amiens, France), Jean Louis Monestes (Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Pinel, University of Picardie, Amiens, France), Valérie Yon (Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Pinel, University of Picardie, Amiens, France) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 113 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 930-934 |
| Publication date | 2013-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/02.19.pr0.113x27z5 |
| PMID | 24693822 |
| OpenAlex | W1993899401 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 13 |
This study explored the criterion-validity of the Cognitive Slippage Scale (CSS) and the Schizotypal Ambivalence Scale (SAS). 27 first-degree relatives of individuals with schizophrenia (9 males, 18 females; M age=45.3 yr., SD=13) were compared with 30 first-degree relatives of non-psychotic patients (15 males, 15 females; M age = 44.6 yr., SD = 11.6) on the French versions of the CSS and SAS. The former group, who is at high risk for schizophrenia, had significantly higher scores than the latter group on both scales
Ambivalence · Cognition · Construct validity · Criterion validity · Developmental psychology · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming · Slippage · Test validity · Validation test · Clinical Psychology · Mental Health Research Topics · Neuroscience and Music Perception · Psychology · Schizophrenia research and treatment · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2014 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |