Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Juveniles Tried as Adults

The Age of the Juvenile Matters

Bibliographic Data

ID13655412
AuthorsJaclyn K Semple (Watkinson, Laird, Rubenstein, Baldwin & Burgess, P.C., corresponding author), William Douglas Woody (0000-0002-2220-7462, University of Northern Colorado)
Year2011
Volume109
Issue1
Pages301-308
Publication date2011-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2466/07.17.pr0.109.4.301-308
PMID22049670
OpenAlexW1975945824
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited15

Serious juvenile crimes require evaluation of a child as a criminal defendant in adult court. In such cases, it is crucial to understand jurors' attitudes, biases, and ability to follow legal instructions and maintain fairness. 308 undergraduate psychology students served as mock jurors, were randomly separated into four groups, and each group read the same realistic summary of a trial with the defendant's age presented as 13, 15, 17, or 21 years. Participants were asked to render guilty or not guilty verdicts and, if guilty, to suggest sentences. Chi-squared analysis indicated 13- and 15-year-old defendants were convicted less often than 17- and 21-year-old defendants, showing that jurors distinguished between juvenile defendants of different ages, but not minors and adults as defined by law. Additional analysis showed that age did not affect sentencing recommendations. Decision processes jurors use for juveniles tried as adults are discussed

Affect (linguistics · Criminology · Juvenile · Juvenile delinquency · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Jury Decision Making Processes · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Beyond the Evidence

    Open Access•Bailey M Fraser, Emily Pica et al.•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2025

  • Waiving goodbye to youth

    Open Access•Jacqueline Katzman, Melanie B Fessinger et al.•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2022

  • The More You Know

    Open Access•Isabelle M Clough, April Gile Thomas•Crime & Delinquency•2026

  • “Shy” and “Beautiful Boy” Versus “Strapping 6ft 2in Teenager”

    Annina Heini, Yuze Sha•International Journal of Speech…•2026

  • Transfer of Minors to Adult Court in California

    Open Access•Nadav Goldschmied, Ally Ramona et al.•Psychological Reports•2023

  • The ecological validity of jury simulations

    Brian H Bornstein•Law and Human Behavior•1999

  • Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct

    American Psychological Association•American Psychologist•2002

  • The construction and validation of a juror bias scale

    Open Access•Saul M Kassin, Lawrence S Wrightsman•Journal of Research in Personality•1983

  • The Evolution of Adolescence

    Elizabeth S Scott, Thomas Grisso•The Journal of Criminal Law and…•1997

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1,25
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae