Stimulus-Change Effects of Forcing in Alternation Behavior
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13655430 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R N HUGHES (Queen's University Belfast, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1966 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 515-518 |
| Publication date | 1966-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.2.515 |
| PMID | 5912816 |
| OpenAlex | W2037344942 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
To test the hypothesis that forcing left or right in a T-maze produces more alternation because of the stimulus-change resulting from subsequent removal of the arm barrier, rats were given free-choice trials and forced trials with a wooden barrier (favouring a high degree of change) and with a transparent barrier (favouring a lower degree of change). Although alternation was unaffected by the three conditions, the percentage of first investigatory responses directed toward the alternate arm on Trial 2 was highest following forcing with the wooden barrier. It was concluded that a stimulus-change explanation for the effects of forcing was acceptable if these first investigatory responses were acknowledged as indices of initial attraction of attention by an arm
Alternation (linguistics · Audiology · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Forcing (mathematics · Spontaneous alternation · Stimulus (psychology · Mathematics · Medicine · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neuroscience · Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |