Answering Two Criticisms of Hypothesis Testing
Reply to Serlin
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13656273 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Les Leventhal (University of Manitoba, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 707-707 |
| Publication date | 2001-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.88.3.707-710 |
| PMID | 11508007 |
| OpenAlex | W4253919193 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
Two criticisms of hypothesis testing have been repeated for half a century. Leventhal (1999) defended against those criticisms. Serlin (2000) commented on Leventhal's paper and criticized parts of Leventhal's defense. Serlin's comments are discussed and his criticisms answered
Epistemology · Psychoanalysis · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |