Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Information Processing Styles
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13664832 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mustafa Baloğlu (0000-0003-1874-9004, East Texas A&M University, corresponding author), Paul F Zelhart (East Texas A&M University) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 973-979 |
| Publication date | 2000-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.2000.87.3.973 |
| PMID | 11191415 |
| OpenAlex | W2082714316 |
| Language | EN |
To investigate concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Information Processing Styles, 62 students majoring in social sciences evaluated the accuracy of the checklist in describing their dominant types. Each student had a friend who read the descriptions of the dominant type(s) of the student and rated their perceived accuracy of that categorization. Analyses indicated the inventory is reliable and valid
Categorization · Checklist · Cognitive psychology · Concurrent validity · Internal consistency · Psychometrics · Reliability (semiconductor · Test (biology · Test validity · Applied Psychology · Artificial Intelligence · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences · Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences · Psychology · Social Psychology · Statistics Education and Methodologies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|