Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Coping with Loneliness and Locus of Control

Bibliographic Data

ID13668386
AuthorsThomas Schill (Southern Illinois University Carbondale, corresponding author), Carmen Toves (Southern Illinois University Carbondale), Nerella V Ramanaiah (Southern Illinois University Carbondale), Nerella Ramanaiah (Southern Illinois University Carbondale)
Year1980
Volume47
Issue3_suppl
Pages1054-1054
Publication date1980-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2466/pr0.1980.47.3f.1054
PMID7220734
OpenAlexW2322967220
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited2

The present study sought to determine the relative ability of internal and external subjects to handle the problem of loneliness. Research by Johnson and Sarason (1978) has suggested that an internal locus of control is much more effective in helping one deal with stressful life events. If this is the case, one should find a positive relationship between degree of loneliness and number of emotional and psychosomatic complaints on the Cornell Medical Index Form N-2 (Weider, Wolff, Brodman, Mittelman, & Wechsler, 1949) for external subjects but not for internal ones. Subjects were 150 college sophomores in introductory psychology. A score of 11, the median, was used to define extercality. Pearson correlations between loneliness scores on the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Russell, Peplau, & Ferguson, 1978) and on the Cornell Index were for male internal subjects ( N = 41) .48 ( P .05), for female internal subjects ( N = 35) .38 (P :05). The results indicate positive and significant small to moderate relationships between loneliness and somatic and psychological distress for internal subjects but not external subjects although the correlation for female external scorers falls just short of significance. These results call into question the conclusion of Johnson and Sarason that internal subjects cope better with stress. This certainly is not true for the stress of loneliness. On the contrary, it was particularly the male external subjects who appeared to be least affected by loneliness. This seems to be one of the few areas reported so far in the literature where an external orientation seems to hold some advantage. Whether the advantage is temporary or long-term remains to be determined

Coping (psychology · Developmental psychology · Distress · Locus of control · Loneliness · UCLA Loneliness Scale · Clinical Psychology · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Health disparities and outcomes · Health, psychology, and well-being · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Loneliness, Duration of Loneliness, and Reported Stress Symptomatology

    Open Access•M Scott DeBerard, Ronald A Kleinknecht•Psychological Reports•1995

  • Loneliness in Elderly Persons

    Open Access•Steven K Baum•Psychological Reports•1982

  • Developing a Measure of Loneliness

    Daniel W Russell, Dan Russell et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•1978

  • Life stress, depression and anxiety

    Open Access•James H Johnson, Irwin G Sarason•Journal of Psychosomatic Research•1978

Citations per year0.05
Citation span1982 - 1995 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae