Reply to Comments on Byravan and Ramanaiah's 1995 Study of the Structure of the 16Pf Fifth Edition from the Perspective of the Five-Factor Model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13669043 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anupama Byravan (Southern Illinois University Carbondale), Nerella V Ramanaiah (Southern Illinois University Carbondale, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 123-126 |
| Publication date | 1996-08-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.1996.79.1.123 |
| OpenAlex | W2077287172 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
This article provides a reply to Cattell's 1995 comments on some methodological issues related to Byravan and Ramanaiah's 1995 study and shows that their study was methodologically sound. It was concluded that the results of Byravan and Ramanaiah's study were different from those of Cattell's 1995 factor analyses mainly due to the fact that the former involved the factor analysis of 16PF primary scales from the perspective of the five-factor model using Revised NEO Personality Inventory domain scales and Goldberg's 1992 scales as markers for the five major factors whereas the latter investigated the structure of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory facet scales from the perspective of the 16PF global scales
16PF Questionnaire · Big Five personality traits · Big Five personality traits and culture · Developmental psychology · Domain (mathematical analysis · Facet (psychology · Factor (programming language · Personality · Personality Assessment Inventory · Perspective (graphical · Psychometrics · Artificial Intelligence · Emotional Intelligence and Performance · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|