Moral Cognition About Harm in Anxiety Disorders
The Importance of Experienced Emotion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13670665 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Indrajeet Patil (0000-0003-1995-6531, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany), Emmett M Larsen (0000-0002-8516-5538, Stony Brook University, corresponding author), Rafael Kichic (Buenos Aires), Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht (0000-0002-4212-4146, Medical University of South Carolina) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 124 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 2501-2523 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0033294120964134 |
| PMID | 33028157 |
| OpenAlex | W3092393554 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 65 |
Recent work has shown that emotional arousal influences decision-making in sacrificial moral dilemmas, with heightened levels of arousal associated with increased aversion to committing moral transgressions to maximize utilitarian outcomes. Patients with anxiety disorders experience pathologically heightened states of arousal and thus may be expected to exhibit reduced utilitarian responding on such dilemmas. Extant evidence has been mixed, however, regarding whether anxious patients differ in their moral decisions from controls, and no study has conducted a careful examination of emotions experienced during decision-making. We administered sacrificial moral dilemmas to a cohort of 95 patients from across the spectrum of anxiety disorders to test whether they differed from matched controls on a) utilitarian decision-making, and b) ratings of experienced emotion during the moral deliberative process. Results showed no group differences between patients and controls on endorsement of utilitarian sacrificial action or on reported experience of emotionality during the experiment. Additionally, exploratory analysis revealed that specific emotions were correlated with utilitarian judgments. These results are in line with the Dual Process Theory model's prediction that decreased utilitarian responding will be concomitant with an increased emotional arousal. Our findings support past work indicating that moral cognition is intact in anxiety disorders despite the emotional dysregulation characteristic of anxious psychopathology. Future work would benefit from the use of process-dissociation techniques to further clarify whether emotional or cognitive processes may differ in anxiety disorders during moral cognition
Anxiety · Arousal · Cognition · Developmental psychology · Emotionality · Harm · Psychiatry · Clinical Psychology · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Ethics in Business and Education · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Killing for the greater good
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
Fears, phobias, and preparedness
Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors
The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality
Why Psychologists Should by Default Use Welch’s t-test Instead of Student’s t-test
Action, Outcome, and Value
Development and validation of the penn state worry questionnaire
Pushing moral buttons
The emotional dog and its rational tail
Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science
Outcome-focused judgements of moral dilemmas in schizophrenia
Bad actions or bad outcomes? Differentiating affective contributions to the moral condemnation of harm
Not just bad actions
Things rank and gross in nature
Reconceptualizing Anxiety as a Continuum That Ranges From High Calmness to High Anxiety
Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures
Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making
Measuring individual differences in empathy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |