Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Moral Cognition About Harm in Anxiety Disorders

The Importance of Experienced Emotion

Bibliographic Data

ID13670665
AuthorsIndrajeet Patil (0000-0003-1995-6531, Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA; Center for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany), Emmett M Larsen (0000-0002-8516-5538, Stony Brook University, corresponding author), Rafael Kichic (Buenos Aires), Ezequiel Gleichgerrcht (0000-0002-4212-4146, Medical University of South Carolina)
Year2020
Volume124
Issue6
Pages2501-2523
Publication date2020-10-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0033294120964134
PMID33028157
OpenAlexW3092393554
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited65

Recent work has shown that emotional arousal influences decision-making in sacrificial moral dilemmas, with heightened levels of arousal associated with increased aversion to committing moral transgressions to maximize utilitarian outcomes. Patients with anxiety disorders experience pathologically heightened states of arousal and thus may be expected to exhibit reduced utilitarian responding on such dilemmas. Extant evidence has been mixed, however, regarding whether anxious patients differ in their moral decisions from controls, and no study has conducted a careful examination of emotions experienced during decision-making. We administered sacrificial moral dilemmas to a cohort of 95 patients from across the spectrum of anxiety disorders to test whether they differed from matched controls on a) utilitarian decision-making, and b) ratings of experienced emotion during the moral deliberative process. Results showed no group differences between patients and controls on endorsement of utilitarian sacrificial action or on reported experience of emotionality during the experiment. Additionally, exploratory analysis revealed that specific emotions were correlated with utilitarian judgments. These results are in line with the Dual Process Theory model's prediction that decreased utilitarian responding will be concomitant with an increased emotional arousal. Our findings support past work indicating that moral cognition is intact in anxiety disorders despite the emotional dysregulation characteristic of anxious psychopathology. Future work would benefit from the use of process-dissociation techniques to further clarify whether emotional or cognitive processes may differ in anxiety disorders during moral cognition

Anxiety · Arousal · Cognition · Developmental psychology · Emotionality · Harm · Psychiatry · Clinical Psychology · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Ethics in Business and Education · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Cognitive load and moral decision-making in moral dilemmas under virtual reality

    Open Access•Yatong Liu, Chenhui Dai et al.•Current Psychology•2025

  • Big Five Personality Traits and Moral-Dilemma Judgments

    Open Access•Dillon M Luke, Bertram Gawronski•Journal of Research in Personality•2022

  • Killing for the greater good

    Open Access•Melissa M Mcdonald, Andrew M Defever et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2017

  • A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values

    Open Access•Eric-Jan Wagenmakers•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2007

  • Fears, phobias, and preparedness

    Arne Öhman, Susan Mineka•Psychological Review•2001

  • Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)

    Thomas R Insel, Thomas Insel et al.•American Journal of Psychiatry•2010

  • What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors

    Open Access•Andrew F Jarosz, Jennifer Wiley•The Journal of Problem Solving•2014

  • The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Neuron•2004

  • Beyond Point-and-Shoot Morality

    Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene•Ethics•2014

  • Why Psychologists Should by Default Use Welch’s t-test Instead of Student’s t-test

    Open Access•Marie Delacre, Daniël Lakens et al.•International Review of Social…•2017

  • Action, Outcome, and Value

    Open Access•Fiery Cushman•Personality and Social Psychology…•2013

  • Development and validation of the penn state worry questionnaire

    Open Access•Thomas Meyer, T J Meyer et al.•Behaviour Research and Therapy•1990

  • Pushing moral buttons

    Open Access•Jerome D Greene, Joshua D Greene et al.•Cognition•2009

  • The emotional dog and its rational tail

    Jonathan Haidt•Psychological Review•2001

  • Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science

    Open Access•Daniël Lakens•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Outcome-focused judgements of moral dilemmas in schizophrenia

    Open Access•Jonathan McGuire, Martin Brüne et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2017

  • Bad actions or bad outcomes? Differentiating affective contributions to the moral condemnation of harm

    Ryan M Miller, Ivar R Hannikainen et al.•Emotion•2014

  • Not just bad actions

    Jesse Reynolds, Paul Conway•Emotion•2018

  • Things rank and gross in nature

    Hanah A Chapman, Adam K Anderson•Psychological Bulletin•2013

  • Reconceptualizing Anxiety as a Continuum That Ranges From High Calmness to High Anxiety

    Open Access•Andy P Siddaway, Paul J Taylor et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2017

  • Reasoning supports utilitarian resolutions to moral dilemmas across diverse measures

    Indrajeet Patil, Micaela Maria Zucchelli et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2021

  • Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making

    Paul Conway, Bertram Gawronski•Journal of Personality and Social…•2013

  • Measuring individual differences in empathy

    Mark H Davis•Journal of Personality and Social…•1983

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae