Accessing Directorships
Comparison of Views of Canadian and Australian Women Directors
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13673276 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alison Sheridan (0009-0001-1736-3647, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 150-150 |
| Publication date | 2002-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2466/pr0.90.1.150-156 |
| OpenAlex | W4256320171 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
Compared are views of Canadian and Australian women directors concerning the difficulties women face in accessing the most privileged level of management—directorships of companies. The Canadian data are from a study of 278 women directors of corporate boards in Canada while the Australian results are from a study of 47 women directors of publicly listed companies in Australia. Despite the different time periods and geographical locations in which the studies were carried out, the profiles and responses of the two groups are quite similar. Both groups believe the current mix of directors is not adequate and that barriers still exist in nominating women to boards
Business · Face (sociological concept · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Accounting · Corporate Finance and Governance · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Politics and Representation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|