Gender Roles in the Millennium
Who Pays and Is Expected to Pay for Romantic Dates
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13673333 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hao Wu (0000-0001-5323-516X, School of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China), Shanhong Luo (0000-0002-0022-8967, University of North Carolina Wilmington, corresponding author), Annelise Klettner (0000-0003-3230-1417, University of North Carolina Wilmington), Tyler D White (University of North Carolina Wilmington), Tyler White (University of North Carolina Wilmington), Kate Albritton (University of North Carolina Wilmington) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 126 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 791-811 |
| Publication date | 2021-12-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00332941211057144 |
| PMID | 34874209 |
| OpenAlex | W4200595171 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 39 |
Research on monetary decisions and behaviors in dating relationships is very limited. The purpose of this study was to examine college students' current practice and expectations for date payment for first and subsequent romantic dates in the framework of gender role theory. A sample of 552 heterosexual college students took an online survey that included questions about their actual and expected payment for their first and subsequent dates. Participants also completed several measures regarding their gender roles. The findings indicated that traditional gender norms in dating continue to be popular in the new millennium because in actual practice, men almost always paid the whole bill of the first dates and paid more for subsequent dates. When asked who should pay for the dates, participants also expected men to pay more for first and subsequent dates. Women did show some willingness to share date expenses, although nowhere close to be completely even. The findings also indicated that gender role attitudes played little role in actual practice but had a stronger role in date payment expectations, showing that individuals subscribing to traditional gender inequality views tended to believe that men should pay more for dates
Economics · Gender inequality · Inequality · Payment · Romance · Sociology · Willingness to pay · Demography · Finance · Gender Roles and Identity Studies · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology
Women’s Endorsement of Heteronormative Dating Scripts is Predicted by Sexism, Feminist Identity, A Preference for Dominant Men, and A Preference Against Short-Term Relationships
Allies on the streets but illiberal in the sheets? Gender and the public vs. private inclusion of sexual minorities
Does He Like Me? Feminine Norms, Dating Anxiety, and the Mediating Role of Personal Empowerment in Young Adult Women Who Date Men
Comparing Foodie Calls in Poland, the United Kingdom, and the United States
Sex Differences in Social Behavior
Toward a fuller conception of Machismo
Gender schema theory
Masculinity and Femininity
Sexual Double Standard
Trends in U.S. Gender Attitudes, 1977 to 2018
The Shift from Dating to Hooking up in College
Women's Perceptions of Male Partners' Gender Role Conflict as Predictors of Psychological Well-Being and Relationship Satisfaction
Who pays after the first date? Young men’s discourses of the male-provider role
Men's Conformity to Traditional Masculinity and Relationship Satisfaction
Girls Don’t Propose! Ew.”
The Attitudes Toward Women Scale and Attitude Change in College Students
Safer, Better Sex Through Feminism
Hostile and Benevolent Sexism
The Masculinity of Mr. Right
The Relations Among Feminist Identity Development, Gender-Role Orientation, and Psychological Well-Being in Women
Attitudes Toward Women, 1970–1995
What Good is a Feminist Identity
Young singles' contemporary dating scripts
Measuring Gender Orientation with the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Chinese Culture
To Hook Up or Date
Has Dating Become More Egalitarian? A 35 Year Review Using Sex Roles
The “True” Romantic
The Interpersonal Power of Feminism
Masculinity Ideology, Male Identity, and Romantic Relationship Quality Among Heterosexual and Gay Men
Heterosexual Dating Double Standards in Undergraduate Women and Men
Do Feminist Women Feel Better About their Lives? Examining Patterns of Feminist Identity Development and Women’s Subjective Well-being
First-Date Scripts
Dating and eating. How university students select eating settings
On Deconstructing and Reconstructing Masculinity–Femininity
Is Sexism for White People? Gender Stereotypes, Race, and the 2016 Presidential Election
Who Pays for Dates? Following Versus Challenging Gender Norms
Spouses' gender-typed attributes and their links with marital quality
Negotiating Courtship
Separating Spheres? Diverging Trends in Youth's Gender Attitudes About Work and Family
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |