The Construct, Convergent and Divergent Validity, and Reliability of Three Optimism Scales among North American University Students

Datos Bibliográficos

ID13675342
AutoresCirilo Humberto García Cadena (0000-0001-6066-7745, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, autor de correspondencia), Héctor Luis Díaz (0000-0002-6583-3869, Western Michigan University), Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez (0000-0002-5349-7570, Private University of the North)
Año2020
Volumen124
Número3
Páginas1412-1430
Fecha de publicación2020-06-23
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
EditorialSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0033294120933144
PMID32576093
OpenAlexW3037725412
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas1
Referencias citadas37

The primary objective of this study is to compare the construct, convergent and divergent validity and the reliability of three optimism scales. The study relied on a nonprobability sample of 100 social work students at Western Michigan University in the United States (Seventy-nine percent of the sample were female, and 21% were male). The sample's mean age was 26.35 years, SD = 7.70. Sixty-nine percent (69%) of the respondents self-identified as White, and 31% self-identified as African American, Hispanic/Latino, multiethnic, Native American or Asian American. The study used confirmatory factor and multiple regression analyses (CFA and MRA). The findings show that the Life Orientation Test-Revised (LOT-R) and the Personal Optimism Scale (POS) were supported by three indicators of goodness of fit, while the Brief Interactive Optimism Scale-Garcia (BIOS-G) was supported by eight. The LOT-R showed no acceptable internal consistency indicators, but the POS and the BIOS-G showed several good internal consistency indicators. Correlations of all of these scales with the Physical Well-being Scale-Garcia (PWS-G) ranged from r (100) = .303, p = .002 to r (100) = .439, p = .000. The three scales had divergent validity because their scores did not differ by gender (LOT-R: t(100) = -.885, p = .383; POS: t(100) = -.263, p = .794; BIOS-G: t(100) = -.840, p = .407). The findings suggest the advisability of recommending the BIOS-G, which is short and easy to use and understand

Confirmatory factor analysis · Construct validity · Convergent validity · Geography · Goodness of fit · Internal consistency · Optimism · Psychometrics · Sample (material · Scale (ratio · Sociology · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Clinical Psychology · Demography · Mathematics · Optimism, Hope, and Well-being · Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social Psychology