Accuracy and Response Time for Modus Ponens Syllogisms Vary by Controversial Topic and Categorical Emotion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13675459 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leslie J Kelley (0000-0002-8450-6046, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX, USA, corresponding author), Anissia Espinoza (University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, USA), Drew A Curtis (0000-0003-4655-7253, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX, USA), Adam Randell (University of Central Oklahoma, Edmond, OK, USA), Adam K Abuharthieh (Collin College - Preston Ridge Campus, Frisco, TX, USA) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 126 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 3000-3027 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00332941221125777 |
| PMID | 37964448 |
| OpenAlex | W4388703481 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
Researchers have documented differential effects of emotion on cognitive processes, debating whether emotion may increase or decrease the response time and accuracy of logical thinking. The current study proposed that differences may be due to variability occurring across topic and categorical emotions, such that assessment of several basic emotional responses in the context of performing logical reasoning tasks may provide an initial indication of these differences. Utilizing modus ponens syllogisms composed of controversial statements, the current study evoked a variety of emotional responses and tested the accuracy of participants' basic logical thinking. Results indicated that logical skills were largely preserved despite the topic and emotion, nonetheless, accuracy varied across syllogism type (controversial vs. control), with increased accuracy on controversial syllogisms. Syllogisms rated as evoking no emotion were answered more accurately than those that evoked any emotion, with disgust and anger associated with less accuracy than no emotion and gladness associated with increased accuracy. Response times also differed across syllogism type, emotion, and emotion intensity
Anger · Automaticity · Categorical variable · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Context (archaeology · Disgust · Inference · Linguistics · Meditation · Modus ponens · Syllogism · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Controversy in the Classroom
What is Meant by Calling Emotions Basic
The Behavioral Immune System (and Why It Matters)
Individual differences in reasoning
The influence of affect on higher level cognition
Intellectual Evolution from Adolescence to Adulthood
The effect of fear and anger on selective attention
Contained risk-taking
The Influence of Emotonal Subject Matter on Logical Reasoning
The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Social Influence on Political Judgments
The Influence of “Social Viewing” on Televised Debate Viewers’ Political Judgment
Anger is an approach-related affect
| Highly cited | No |
|---|