Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rethinking the Admissions Interview

Piloting Multiple Mini-Interviews in a Graduate Psychology Program

Bibliographic Data

ID13677582
AuthorsJennifer Clark (0000-0003-4008-5419, Pacific University, Hillsboro, OR, USA, corresponding author), Catherine Miller (0000-0002-0352-3777, Pacific University Oregon), Catherine A Miller (Pacific University, Hillsboro, OR, USA), Erin L Garwood (Pacific University, Hillsboro, OR, USA)
Year2019
Volume123
Issue5
Pages1869-1886
Publication date2019-12-22
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2941 • E-ISSN: 1558-691X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0033294119896062
PMID31865837
OpenAlexW2995248543
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited30

Health profession programs routinely utilize traditional interviews in admissions as a means of assessing important non-academic characteristics (e.g., critical thinking, interpersonal skills, judgment) of candidates. However, the reliability and validity of traditional interviews is highly questionable. Given this, multiple health profession programs (e.g., medicine, nursing, pharmacy, physical therapy) have implemented multiple mini-interviews as an alternative for assessing non-academic characteristics. This paper describes the development and implementation of multiple mini-interviews in the admissions process for a doctoral clinical psychology program, one of the health professions yet to use multiple mini-interviews. This paper also examines the feasibility and acceptability of the multiple mini-interviews in this program. Results of a mixed-method survey of all 120 candidates who participated in admissions days are presented along with discussion of factors associated with satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Recommendations for program refinement and application to other graduate psychology programs for improved admissions processes are discussed

Health care · Interpersonal communication · Medical education · Program evaluation · Reliability (semiconductor · Applied Psychology · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Health Professions · Innovations in Medical Education · Medical Education and Admissions · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Working with the nerves

    Open Access•Brittany Patafio, Jade Sheen et al.•Australian Psychologist•2026

  • How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review

    Open Access•Fiona Patterson, Alec Knight et al.•Medical Education•2016

  • Bias in Assessment of Noncognitive Attributes

    Open Access•Rick D Axelson, KRISTI J FERGUSON•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2012

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae