A Reply to Howard Sherman
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13693129 |
|---|---|
| Authors | G M Hodgson (0000-0002-5823-3996, University of Cambridge, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 295-306 |
| Publication date | 1998-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Review of Social Economy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6764 • E-ISSN: 1470-1162 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00346769800000029 |
| OpenAlex | W1580267145 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 16 |
In the Spring 1998 (56(1): 47-58) issue of this journal, Howard Sherman criticized the alleged methodological individualism and critique of Marxism by Geoffrey Hodgson. This reply denies that Hodgson is a methodological individualist and defends his Veblenian criticism of Marx. It is also contended that Marx was not a Darwinian and did not incorporate essential Darwinian ideas in his thinking
Criticism · Darwinism · Epistemology · Individualism · Methodological individualism · Political science · Politics · Social Darwinism · Sociology · Economic Theory and Institutions · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
Economics and evolution
More Heat than Light
Economics and Institutions
Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?
A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy (1859)
A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy
After Marx and Sraffa
Relations of Production
Economic Evolution
Selected Works (in Two Volumes)
Free to Lose
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,04 |
| Citation span | 2001 - 2001 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |