Commentary on Coulter et al. 2019 ‘Attaining Theoretical Coherence Within Relationship-Based Practice in Child and Family Social Work
The Systemic Perspective’
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13773141 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Mc Kenny (0000-0002-0142-2526, Relational Third, UK, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1630-1635 |
| Publication date | 2020-05-28 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0045-3102 • E-ISSN: 1468-263X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa072 |
| OpenAlex | W3042218356 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 9 |
Coulter et al. (2019) argue that there is an urgent need for a theoretically coherent conceptualisation of contemporary relationship-based practice (RBP) models within child and family social work. They propose that a systemic and social constructionist ‘lens’ can provide this coherence. This reply draws attention to one particular difficulty with their argument and makes a partial case for maintaining clear distinctions between models, with distinct nomenclature
Argument (complex analysis · Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy · Epistemology · Perspective (graphical · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics · Family and Disability Support Research · Mathematics · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice
| Highly cited | No |
|---|