Does Citation Analysis Help or Hinder the Professional Development of Social Workers and Their Profession? A Reply to Slater, Scourfield and Sloan
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13773207 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David R Hodges (0000-0001-6672-9070, University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author), D R Hodge, Jeffrey R Lacasse (0000-0002-5448-8721, Florida State University) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 469-472 |
| Publication date | 2013-11-24 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The British Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0045-3102 • E-ISSN: 1468-263X |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/bjsw/bct183 |
| OpenAlex | W2144497296 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
This article responds to Slater, Scourfield and Sloan's assessment and analysis of our earlier British Journal of Social Work article delineating the 100 most highly cited articles in disciplinary social work journals during the past decade. We address two primary issues in our response. First, we provide background on the circumstances that animated the larger research agenda from which the BJSW article emanated. Second, we discuss how the authors' empirical work illustrates the potential of citation analysis to spark conversations that facilitate professional reflection and growth. We conclude by noting that every method is characterised by a certain set of limitations and that citation analysis has the potential to assist both social workers and their profession if used appropriately
Citation · Discipline · Engineering ethics · Political science · Set (abstract data type · Social science · Sociology · Work (physics · Computer Science · Engineering · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration · Law · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |