Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Qualitative Process Evaluation and Quality Improvement of a State Drug Overdose Reporting System Data Collection Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID13775973
AuthorsMircea Lazar (0000-0002-2677-7518, Office of Informatics and Analytics, Nashville, TN, USA, corresponding author), Joshua Jayasundara (Office of Informatics and Analytics, Nashville, TN, USA), Jessica Korona-Bailey (0000-0002-0314-5171, Office of Informatics and Analytics, Nashville, TN, USA), Sutapa Mukhopadhyay (0009-0004-7712-4201, Office of Informatics and Analytics, Nashville, TN, USA)
Year2024
Volume61
Pages469580241298145-469580241298145
Publication date2024-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueINQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0046-9580 • E-ISSN: 1945-7243
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/00469580241298145
PMID39568314
OpenAlexW4404601545
LanguageEN
References cited9

Tennessee registered the second-highest drug overdose mortality rate of any state in 2022; such deaths have grown by 90% from 2019 to 2022. Tennessee has participated in the State Unintentional Drug Overdose Reporting System (SUDORS) since 2018. An abstraction team synthesizes data for SUDORS from death certificates, autopsies, and other sources. The purpose of this study was to engage in a comprehensive qualitative evaluation of our SUDORS process to distill insights that could improve abstraction speed and quality while reducing abstractor burnout. We conducted 2 rounds of interviews and focus groups with all 7 members of the Tennessee abstraction team in late 2023 and early 2024. The researcher asked questions regarding the adequacy of the current project management approach and team communication level, abstractors' stress levels, the need for further training, and whether additional data science-based tools could be deployed to increase the speed and accuracy of abstraction. The study yielded several actionable insights for improving abstraction capacity and lessening stress burdens. Accordingly, we made changes to our project management, team communication, and training approaches; worked to better integrate our extant data science tools; and took steps to improve mental well-being. As a result, the average time it takes for an abstractor to enter a case into the NVDRS platform dropped from 12.2 to 6.5 minutes, and all team members noted a decrease in stress levels. The changes made as a result of the findings of this study will help the State keep pace with a high case load and will support abstractors' mental well-being

Burnout · Business · Data collection · Focus group · Medical education · Pace · Process (computing · Qualitative property · Qualitative research · Quality (philosophy · Sociology · Applied Psychology · Big Data and Business Intelligence · Clinical Psychology · Computer Science · Knowledge Management and Technology · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology

  • An Introduction to Grounded Theory with a Special Focus on Axial Coding and the Coding Paradigm

    Open Access•Maike Vollstedt, Sebastian Rezat•Compendium for Early Career…•2019

  • Burnout

    Open Access•Sergio Edú-Valsania, Ana Laguía et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Focus Groups as Qualitative Research

    David Morgan, David L Morgan•Focus groups as qualitative…•1997

  • Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions

    Russell E Glasgow, Thomas Vogt et al.•American Journal of Public Health•1999

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae