Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Psychologists’ endorsement of empirically unsupported statements in psychology

Noch Einmal

Bibliographic Data

ID13823091
AuthorsAshraf Kagee (0000-0003-1241-2566, Stellenbosch University, corresponding author), Elsie Breet (0000-0002-6974-8215, Stellenbosch University)
Year2015
Volume45
Issue3
Pages397-409
Publication date2015-04-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSouth African Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0081-2463 • E-ISSN: 2078-208X
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0081246315581345
OpenAlexW2146804891
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited15

In this study, 103 South African psychologists were asked to rate the extent to which they believed a set of empirically incorrect statements were true or untrue. Of the 50 statements, 14 (28%) received a moderate level of endorsement as being factually correct and 8 (16%) received a high level of endorsement as being factually correct. Significant differences in the percentages of items endorsed were found between master’s- and doctoral-level psychologists for five statements. Significant differences in the percentages of items endorsed between clinical and counselling psychologists were found for three statements. These findings are explained by noting that there is no consensus among psychologists about whether psychology is a strictly scientific discipline and whether it gives rise to scientific facts about human behaviour. Relatedly, it is possible that South African psychology curricula are not sufficiently focused on the empirical and scientific evidence that informs psychological knowledge. Also, psychology as taught in undergraduate programmes is characterised by a diversity of theory. Consequently, no consensus on theoretical understandings of human behaviour appears to be in sight. Finally, popular and folk understandings of psychology overlap to some extent with empirical psychology, but what makes intuitive sense may not be empirically accurate. Some suggestions are offered for the curricula psychology of departments at South African universities

Curriculum · Diversity (politics · Empirical evidence · Epistemology · Pedagogy · Psychological research · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Educational and Psychological Assessments · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Reports of Recovered Memories in Therapy in Undergraduate Students

    Open Access•Lawrence Patihis, Ryan S Wood et al.•Psychological Reports•2020

  • Same concept, different label

    Open Access•Amy Salkeld, Lawrence Patihis•Memory•2025

  • Dreaming and the brain

    Open Access•J Allan Hobson, Edward F Pace-Schott et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2000

  • South African Psychologists' Judgments of Widely Held Beliefs about Psychological Phenomena

    Open Access•Ashraf Kagee•South African Journal of Psychology•2009

  • Psychology Training Directors' Reflections on Evidence-Based Practice in South Africa

    Open Access•Ashraf Kagee, Crick Lund•South African Journal of Psychology•2012

  • Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered

    Jeffrey Jensen Arnett•American Psychologist•1999

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.33
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae