Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

P2-286 Systematic review with meta-analysis of population-based vs school-based studies of obesity prevalence among adolescents from Brazil

Bibliographic Data

ID13842008
AuthorsBetina Soldateli (0000-0003-0599-908X, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, corresponding author), Sandra Cristina Pereira Costa Fuch (0000-0001-6351-9588, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre), S Fuchs, F Schmidt (0009-0006-2065-8629), Francianny Danyella Schmidt (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul)
Year2011
Volume65
IssueSuppl 1
PagesA301.1-A301
Publication date2011-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0143-005X • E-ISSN: 1470-2738
PublisherBMJ (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1136/jech.2011.142976k.19
OpenAlexW2013225186
LanguageEN

Introduction In Brazil, obesity prevalence in adolescents has been investigated in different regions and periods of time. Studies of school-based samples have low cost and are easily conducted, being widely used. Otherwise, population-based studies require greatest investments, more time and researches, besides high complexity to minimise bias. Objective To undertake meta-analysis of observational studies conducted in Brazilian adolescents to calculate pooled estimates for obesity prevalence for school-based vs population-based samplings. Methods Data sources included Medline, Embase, Bireme, and CAPES-Thesis database searching for articles and grey literature about obesity prevalence in adolescents aged 10–19 years, from studies conducted in Brazil from 1980 to 2010. Studies were systematically reviewed, with no language restriction, and independently extracted by two investigators using a standardised protocol. Obesity was defined by body mass index (BMI) ≥95 Percentile, for sex and age. Data analysis was performed by Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 2.0®, using random effect model. Results Among 1939 articles reviewed, 138 met the inclusion criteria, 56 were excluded, and 25 were not retrieved after three attempts to contact authors. Among 57 studies included in meta-analysis 14 were population-based and 43 school-based samples. No significant heterogeneity was detected (Q=8.25, p=0.001). Obesity prevalence in population-based studies was 5.5 (95% CI 4.2 to 7.1) and in school-based studies it was 5.1 (95% CI 4.3 to 6.0). School-based studies showed higher inconsistency measure of results when compared with population-based samples studies (I 2 =7.74 vs 0). Conclusion School-based studies as well population-based studies provide similar estimates of obesity prevalence, since they are rigorously conducted regarding methodological aspects

Body mass index · Environmental health · MEDLINE · Meta-analysis · Obesity · Observational study · Percentile · Population · Statistics · Study heterogeneity · Systematic review · Demography · Healthcare Regulation · Internal Medicine · Medicine · Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet · Gerontology · Pediatrics

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae