Drug use Risks in Portuguese Rural vs Urban Environments
Harm Reduction Challenges in a Progressive Drug Policy Setting
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 13913400 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marta Pinto (0000-0001-8271-2818, Universidade do Porto, corresponding author), Cristiana Vale Pires (0000-0003-4172-0787, CRIA -The Centre for Research in Anthropology, Lisbon, Portugal), Helena Carvalho (0000-0001-5885-3039, Center for Psychology at University of Porto (CPUP), Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal), Catarina Pinto Pereira (Universidade do Porto), Gabriela Almeida Pinto da Silva (0000-0003-4457-8675, Universidade do Porto), Ludmila de Jesus Grilo Carapinha, Filipa Oliveira Gonçalves (Universidade do Porto), Helena Valente (0000-0002-8564-1258, Universidade do Porto) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Pages | 1-9 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-21 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Psychoactive Drugs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0279-1072 • E-ISSN: 2159-9777 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02791072.2025.2449913 |
| PMID | 39835537 |
| OpenAlex | W4406677125 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 22 |
Portugal is commonly recognized as one of the best drug policy examples in the world. Nonetheless, contrasts between drug use risks in rural vs urban settings in the country is an understudied topic, even if its specific challenges are commonly affirmed, both by professionals and people who use drugs (PWUD). The aim of this study was to compare rural and urban environments concerning socio-sanitary services availability; illegal drugs availability; risk behaviors related to drug use; stigma associated with illicit drug use; and social support. Additionally, specific harm reduction challenges and recommendations for improvement were explored. A qualitative study with two focus groups involving people who use drugs, outreach workers and local decision-makers was conducted. Distinct scenarios and challenges in both settings were found: In large cities, a significantly higher specialized service coverage than in rural areas was described. In rural settings, a higher number of drug-related risks, higher levels of stigma and lower availability of human and material resources were mentioned, although being associated with higher levels of informal social support and more proximal relationships with harm reduction teams. This study emphasizes the need for a harm reduction paradigm strongly focused on environmental risk determinants, as much as in individual ones
Drug · Environmental health · Environmental planning · Geography · Harm · Harm reduction · Portuguese · Psychiatry · Public health · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Medicine · Nursing · Opioid Use Disorder Treatment · Psychology · Social Psychology · Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Covid‐19 and Rural Harm Reduction Challenges in the US Southern Mountains
The Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on Drug Use Behaviors, Fentanyl Exposure, and Harm Reduction Service Support among People Who Use Drugs in Rural Settings
Addiction as accomplishment
Challenges and opportunities to integrating family members of injection drug users into harm reduction efforts within the Atlantic Canadian context
The ‘risk environment’
Drug, Set, and Setting
Access to harm reduction services in Atlantic Canada
Down on main street
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Breve olhar sobre o estado da saúde em Portugal
Risk environments and drug harms
Stigmatize the use, not the user? Attitudes on opioid use, drug injection, treatment, and overdose prevention in rural communities
The methodology of Focus Groups
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |