Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Pronounced Regional Variation in Esketamine and Ketamine Prescribing to US Medicaid Patients

Bibliographic Data

ID13913895
AuthorsAlexia G Aguilar (0000-0003-1712-8097, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine), Burke A Beauregard (Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine), Christopher P Conroy (0000-0003-2572-8690, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine), Yashoda T Khatiwoda (Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine), Shantia M E Horsford (Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine), Stephanie D Nichols (0000-0002-3215-1554, Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of New England, Portland, ME, USA), Brian J Piper (0000-0002-2295-445X, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume56
Issue1
Pages33-39
Publication date2023-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Psychoactive Drugs (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0279-1072 • E-ISSN: 2159-9777
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02791072.2023.2178558
PMID36857284
OpenAlexW4322719848
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited30

Ketamine and esketamine are efficacious for treatment-resistant depression. Unlike other antidepressants, ketamine lacks a therapeutic delay and decreases the risk for suicide. This cross-sectional study geographically characterized ketamine and esketamine prescribing to United States (US) Medicaid patients. Ketamine and esketamine prescription rates and spending per state were obtained. Between 2009 and 2020, ketamine prescribing rates peaked in 2013 followed by a general decline. For ketamine and esketamine in 2019, Montana (967/million enrollees) and Indiana (425) showed significantly higher prescription rates, respectively, relative to the national average. A total of 21 states prescribed neither ketamine nor esketamine in 2019. There was a 121.3% increase in esketamine prescriptions from 2019 to 2020. North Dakota (1,423) and North Carolina (1,094) were significantly elevated relative to the average state for esketamine in 2020. Ten states prescribed neither ketamine nor esketamine in 2020. Medicaid programs in 2020 spent 72.7-fold more for esketamine ($25.3 million) than on ketamine (0.3 million). Despite the effectiveness of ketamine and esketamine for treatment-resistant depression and anti-suicidal properties, their use among Medicaid patients was limited and highly variable in many areas of the US. Further research to better understand the origins of this state-level variation is needed

Anesthesia · Depression (economics · Health care · Ketamine · Major depressive disorder · Medicaid · Medical prescription · Treatment-resistant depression · Medicine · Mental Health Research Topics · Treatment of Major Depression · Tryptophan and brain disorders · Internal Medicine · Pharmacology

  • Associations between psychedelic use and adverse outcomes in substance use disorders

    Open Access•Fares Qeadan, Ashlie McCunn et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2025

  • Patterns in (es)citalopram prescriptions to Medicaid and Medicare patients in the United States

    Open Access•Luke R Cavanah, Parita K Ray et al.•Frontiers in Psychiatry•2025

  • Emergency Department Visits for Suspected Suicide Attempts Among Persons Aged 12–25 Years Before and During the Covid-19 Pandemic — United States, January 2019–May 2021

    Open Access•Ellen Yard, Lakshmi Radhakrishnan et al.•MMWR. Surveillance Summaries•2021

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae