Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Challenges of IRB Review and Human Subjects Protections in Practice-Based Research

Bibliographic Data

ID14338409
AuthorsLeslie E Wolf (0000-0002-4660-8383, San Francisco AIDS Foundation, corresponding author), Mary Croughan, Mary S Croughan, Bernard Lo (0000-0001-6210-9667, corresponding author)
Year2002
Volume40
Issue6
Pages521-529
Publication date2002-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0025-7079 • E-ISSN: 1537-1948
PublisherOvid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1097/00005650-200206000-00009
PMID12021678
OpenAlexW2022093061
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited7

Practice-based research raises unique challenges with respect to human subjects protections and institutional review board (IRB) review. In this paper, three challenges posed by practice-based research are analyzed: (1) IRB review for clinician investigators who are not affiliated with an institution that has an IRB; (2) multiple IRB review; and (3) required human subjects protection training of key personnel. Investigators should be proactive in addressing required IRB review in practice-based research. In particular, they need to ensure that appropriate IRB review is obtained for all performance sites and plan for review for unaffiliated investigators. Practice-based research investigators and professional societies should educate IRB members and policy makers and publish articles regarding how IRBs might best address human subjects concerns in practice-based research. Furthermore, practice-based research investigators and professional societies should work with IRBs and the Office for Human Research Protections to facilitate centralized or cooperative review of practice-based research. Finally, practice-based research investigators need to ensure that their clinician investigators receive appropriate training in human subjects protection. Practice-based research investigators and professional societies can facilitate this process by helping to define and implement the appropriate training for busy practice-based research clinicians and office staff

Best practice · Clinical Practice · Engineering ethics · Family medicine · Human research · Institutional review board · Medical education · Political science · Psychiatry · Publication · Health Policy Implementation Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare cost, quality, practices · Law · Medicine

  • Variability in Institutional Approaches to Ethics Review of Community-Based Research Conducted in Collaboration with Unaffiliated Organizations

    Open Access•Michael Silverstein, Mary Banks et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2008

  • Anonymous Self-Evaluation of Performance by Ethics Board Members

    Open Access•James A Feldman, Casey M Rebholz•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2009

  • Development of an Accessible Self-Assessment Tool for Research Ethics Committees in Developing Countries

    Open Access•Hany Sleem, Rehab Abdelhai et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2010

  • An Evaluation of the Middle East Research Training Initiative Tool in Assessing Effective Functioning of Research Ethics Committees

    Open Access•Walter Jaoko, Elizabeth A Bukusi et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2016

  • A Remarkable Legacy of Science

    William M Tierney, Morris Weinberger et al.•Medical Care•2002

  • Demystifying Central Review Boards

    Robert J Levine, Louis Lasagna•IRB Ethics and Human Research•2000

  • National Bioethics Advisory Commission

    Open Access•Stuart Plattner•Anthropology News•2001

Citations per year0.21
Citation span2002 - 2016 (15)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae