Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The unpleasantness of thinking

A meta-analytic review of the association between mental effort and negative affect

Bibliographic Data

ID14447698
AuthorsLouise David (0000-0003-1973-4568, Radboud University Nijmegen), Eliana Vassena (0000-0002-5761-6813, Radboud University Nijmegen), Erik Bijleveld (0000-0001-5892-3236, Radboud University Nijmegen)
Year2024
Volume150
Issue9
Pages1070-1093
Publication date2024-08-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePsychological Bulletin (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/bul0000443
PMID39101924
OpenAlexW4401332682
LanguageEN
Citations received12

Influential theories in psychology, neuroscience, and economics assume that the exertion of mental effort should feel aversive. Yet, this assumption is usually untested, and it is challenged by casual observations and previous studies. Here, we meta-analyze (a) whether mental effort is generally experienced as aversive and (b) whether the association between mental effort and aversive feelings depends on population and task characteristics. We meta-analyzed a set of 170 studies (from 125 articles published in 2019-2020; 358 different tasks; 4,670 unique subjects). These studies were conducted in a variety of populations (e.g., health care employees, military employees, amateur athletes, college students; data were collected in 29 different countries) and used a variety of tasks (e.g., equipment testing tasks, virtual reality tasks, cognitive performance tasks). Despite this diversity, these studies had one crucial common feature: All used the NASA Task Load Index to examine participants' experiences of effort and negative affect. As expected, we found a strong positive association between mental effort and negative affect. Surprisingly, just one of our 15 moderators had a significant effect (effort felt somewhat less aversive in studies from Asia vs. Europe and North America). Overall, mental effort felt aversive in different types of tasks (e.g., tasks with and without feedback), in different types of populations (e.g., university-educated populations and non-university-educated populations), and on different continents. Supporting theories that conceptualize effort as a cost, we suggest that mental effort is inherently aversive. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)

Affect (linguistics) · Association (psychology) · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Diversity (politics) · Feeling · MEDLINE · Mental health · Population · Psychiatry · PsycINFO · Set (abstract data type) · Variety (cybernetics) · Applied Psychology · Emotional Intelligence and Performance · Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout · Medicine · Psychology · Resilience and Mental Health · Social Psychology

  • Frequent Media Use, Media Multitasking, and Perceived Cost of Cognitive Effort

    Open Access•Myoungju Shin, Karen Murphy•Cyberpsychology Behavior and…•2025

  • Experimental evidence that exerting effort increases meaning

    Open Access•Aidan V Campbell, Yiyi Wang et al.•Cognition•2025

  • Throwing good effort after bad

    Open Access•Mario Bogdanov, Sean Devine et al.•Cognition•2026

  • Pragmatism, Dual‐Process Theory, and the Study of Reflective Cognition

    Open Access•Gordon Brett•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2026

  • Life satisfaction of older adults and its influencing factors

    Open Access•Zhenping Zhang, Laifu Xiao et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • The bioethicist as advisor

    Open Access•Max Kramer, Max F Kramer•Metamedicine•2026

  • Reasoning does hurt

    Cédric Cortial, Jérôme Prado et al.•Thinking & Reasoning•2026

  • Revisiting the post-resolution positivity effect in conflict tasks

    Open Access•Jinhui Zhang, Qinghua He et al.•Psychonomic Bulletin & Review•2026

  • Latent profiles of effort roles and their impact on task experience and behavior

    Open Access•Johanna Stähler, Wanja Wolff et al.•Current Psychology•2026

  • Revisiting Persistence in Developmental Psychology

    Open Access•Sunae Kim, Nathan Pond et al.•Human Development•2026

  • The intensity of mental effort

    Open Access•Guido H E Gendolla•Synthese•2025

  • Reconceptualizing Metacognitive Experience in Dual‐Process Reasoning

    Open Access•Cédric Cortial, Jérôme Prado et al.•Cognitive Science•2025

Unique citing works12
Citations per year12
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae