Ethics, Epistemology and Ethnography
The Need for an Anthropological Debate on Ethical Review Processes in Germany
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14512822 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hansjörg Dilger (0000-0002-8493-4286, Freie Universität Berlin, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 191-208 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociologus (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-0377 • E-ISSN: 1865-5106 |
| Publisher | Duncker & Humblot GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.3790/soc.67.2.191 |
| OpenAlex | W2784185241 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 9 |
Over the last years, debates on research ethics – and the way the ethicality of ethnographic research is assessed by institutional boards and committees – have flourished in national and international anthropology. This article discusses the state of the debate in Germany where ethical review boards have remained so far largely absent in regard to anthropological research and where the commitment to ‘act ethically’ during fieldwork (and beyond) remains largely voluntary. By drawing on ethnographic fieldwork on HIV / AIDS and social relations in Tanzania, I highlight that medical anthropologists may face particular ethical challenges in their work, due to the often close relationship of their research with human suffering. Furthermore, however, I argue that the sub-discipline can raise important questions concerning the potential institutionalization of ethical review processes in anthropology in Germany and the pitfalls that should be avoided with regard to the ‘fetishization’ of certain ethical doctrines (such as the informed consent process) which have proven incommensurable with the core epistemological assumptions of the discipline. This article does not provide an exhaustive overview of the debates on ethics that have been conducted in Germany or internationally over the last decade(s). It is rather meant as a political intervention that seeks to broaden the discussion about the potential formalization of ethical review processes in Germany and how the discipline can shape such a process proactively by foregrounding some of its inherent strengths: reflexivity, creativity and dialogue
Bioethics · Engineering ethics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ethnography · Foregrounding · Medical anthropology · Political science · Politics · Reflexivity · Research ethics · Social science · Sociology · Anthropology · Law · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies
Prekäre Freizügigkeiten
Ethical research in the German social sciences
Vielschichtige Lebenswelten, komplexe Vulnerabilitäten – zur Lebens- und Arbeitssituation der Frauen am Straßenstrich im Berliner Kurfürstenkiez
The Political Life of Research Ethics Committees And What It Means for Ethnographic Research
Die emotionale Erfahrung des Asyls
Plans, Changes, Improvisations
Towards an anthropology of global inequalities and their local manifestations
Navigating ‘ethics in practice’
Autoethnography as an ethically contested terrain
The ethnographer, the research participants, and the meaningful others
Improving the Ethics Review of Qualitative Health Research
Ethical Autoethnography
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |