The We-Mode Approach
A Response to John Wettersten’s Review of The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14567787 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Raimo Tuomela (University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland,, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 513-517 |
| Publication date | 2010-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy of the Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0048-3931 • E-ISSN: 1552-7441 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0048393109352830 |
| OpenAlex | W2033775664 |
| Language | EN |
The paper is a response to some critical points and omissions in John Wettersten’s review of my recent book The Philosophy of Sociality: The Shared Point of View (Oxford University Press, 2007). I point out in this short paper that the reviewer has not discussed the most central notions in the book relating to its “we-mode” approach, i.e. collective acceptance, group reasons, the collectivity condition, collective commitment and their role in accounting for e.g. cooperation, social institutions, cultural evolution. I also clarify the ontological commitments of my broadly naturalistic approach and show e.g. that we-mode social groups do exist as social systems but not a full-blown collective agents, although it is conceptually and instrumentally central to view them as collective agents. Also questions of we-mode versus I-mode explanations of collective action are considered in the paper
Collective action · Epistemology · Mode (computer interface) · Naturalism · Point (geometry) · Political science · Social ontology · Sociality · Sociology · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |