Ontological Investigations of a Pragmatic Kind? A Reply to Lauer
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14567826 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Simon Lohse (0000-0002-4119-1929, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 3-12 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy of the Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0048-3931 • E-ISSN: 1552-7441 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0048393120916134 |
| OpenAlex | W3011848449 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 17 |
This article is a reply to Richard Lauer’s “Is Social Ontology Prior to Social Scientific Methodology?” and an attempt to contribute to the meta-social ontological discourse more broadly. In the first part I will give a rough sketch of Lauer’s general project and confront his pragmatist approach with a fundamental problem. The second part of my reply will provide a solution for this problem rooted in a philosophy of the social sciences in practice
Algorithm · Epistemology · Ontology · Pragmatism · Sketch · Sociology · Computer Science · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Critical Realism in Sociology · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education
Die Eigenständigkeit des Sozialen
Making the Social World
Organizational Ecology
The Ant Trap
Metametaphysics
The Heterogeneous Social
Individualism and Holism, Reduction and Pluralism
De-Ontologizing the Debate on Social Explanations
Why Organizational Ecology Is Not a Darwinian Research Program
Debating the Reality of Social Classes
Pragmatism, Ontology, and Philosophy of the Social Sciences in Practice
Is Social Ontology Prior to Social Scientific Methodology
Toward Pragmatist Methodological Relationalism
The Poverty of Ontological Reasoning
A Framework for Social Ontology
Two Kinds of Ontological Commitment
| Citations per year | 1.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |