Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Metaphysics, Elemental Transformation, Medicine

A Specimen of Avicenna’s System of Thought in Ms. Escorial 621

Bibliographic Data

ID14593700
AuthorsAmos Bertolacci (0000-0001-7375-8750, 1 IMT School of Advanced Studies Italy Lucca, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume47
Issue3-4
Pages389-417
Publication date2019-11-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueOriens (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0078-6527 • E-ISSN: 1877-8372
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/18778372-04701600
OpenAlexW2984582433
LanguageEN
References cited5

The present article brings to the scholarly attention the Avicennian manuscript San Lorenzo de El Escorial (Madrid), Real Biblioteca del Monasterio de San Lorenzo de El Escorial, 621, by conveying a basic description of its codicological features and by locating it in the wider context of the connection metaphysics-medicine that the transmission of Avicenna’s magnum opus Kitāb al-Šifāʾ ( Book of the Cure/Healing ) displays. The manuscript at stake is the only extant, though incomplete, codex of the Ilāhiyyāt ( Science of Divine Things ) of Avicenna’s Šifāʾ presently known in the Iberian peninsula (Spain and Portugal), and one of the few codices of the Šifāʾ housed there. In its present state, it cumulates metaphysics and medicine, since it joins some excerpts of the Ilāhiyyāt with fragments of the commentaries on Avicenna’s Al-Qānūn fī l-ṭibb ( Canon of Medicine ) by Ibn al-Nafīs al-Qurašī (d. 687 H /1288) and by Quṭb al-Dīn al-Šīrāzī (634–719 H /1236–1311). The part of the commentary on Avicenna’s Canon by Ibn al-Nafīs al-Qurašī preserved in this manuscript contains a revealing critical quotation of a medical tenet which Avicenna discusses in the Šifāʾ ; this criticism very likely represents an instance of the ‘rectification’ of Avicenna’s philosophical encyclopedia of which Ibn al-Nafīs is credited in historical sources. The example of the revision of Avicenna’s philosophy by Ibn al-Nafīs analyzed on the basis of this manuscript makes clear that physicians in the XIII century did not limit their familiarity with Avicenna’s works to the Canon of Medicine and the other medical works of Avicenna, but adopted some kind of all-encompassing approach to Avicenna’s oeuvre, which did not eschewed tackling critically also the Šifāʾ on the basis of a profound and extensive knowledge of the Šayḫ al-raʾīs’s philosophical masterpiece

Art · Context (archaeology · Humanities · Literature · Magnum opus · Metaphysics · Theology · Classics · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · History of Medicine Studies · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy

  • The Arabic Manuscript Tradition

    Adam Gacek•Arabic Manuscrip[T] Tradition•2001

  • Avicennism and Exegetical Practice in the Early Commentaries on the Ishārāt

    Robert Wisnovsky•Oriens•2013

  • Indirect Evidence for Establishing the Text of the Shifā

    Robert Wisnovsky•Oriens•2012

  • Medical Commentaries

    Nahyan Fancy•Oriens•2013

  • Ibn An-Nafîs (XIIIth Cent.) and His Theory of the Lesser Circulation

    Max Meyerhof•Isis•1935

Highly citedNo
Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae