Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A review of Care’s Community Score Card experience and evidence

Bibliographic Data

ID14668124
AuthorsSara Gullo (0000-0002-9192-5695, CARE USA), Christine Galavotti (CARE USA), Lara Altman
Year2016
Volume31
Issue10
Pages1467-1478
Publication date2016-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Policy and Planning (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0268-1080 • E-ISSN: 1460-2237
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/heapol/czw064
PMID27190223
OpenAlexW2405740302
LanguageEN
Citations received20
References cited17

The global community's growing enthusiasm for the potential of social accountability approaches to improve health system performance and accelerate health progress makes it imperative that we learn from social accountability intervention implementation experience and results. To this end, we carried out a review of Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere, Inc. (CARE)'s experience with the Community Score Card© (CSC)-a social accountability approach CARE developed in Malawi. We reviewed projects that CARE implemented between 2002 and 2013 that employed the CSC and that had at least one evaluation in English. We systematically collected and synthesized information from evaluations on the projects' characteristics, CSC-related outcomes and challenges. Eight projects, spanning five countries, met our inclusion criteria. The projects applied the CSC to various focus areas, mostly health. We identified one to three evaluations, mostly qualitative, for each project. While the evaluations had many limitations, consistency of the results, as well as the range of outcomes, suggests that the CSC is contributing to significant changes. All projects reported CSC-related governance outcomes and service outcomes. There is promising evidence that the CSC can contribute to citizen empowerment, service provider and power-holder effectiveness, accountability and responsiveness and spaces for negotiation between the two that are expanded, effective and inclusive. There is also evidence that the CSC may contribute to improvements in service availability, access, utilization and quality. The CSC seems particularly suited to building trust and strengthening relationships between the community and service providers and to improving the user-centred dimension of quality. All of the projects reported challenges, with ensuring national responsiveness and inclusion of marginalized groups in the CSC process proving to be the most intractable. To improve health system performance and accelerate health progress we recommend further CSC use, enhancements and research.

Accountability · Business · Community engagement · Economic growth · Economics · Empowerment · Health care · Political science · Public relations · Service (business) · Service provider · Social accounting · Global Maternal and Child Health · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Marketing · Medicine · Nursing

  • We all have the same right to have health services’

    Open Access•Marta Schaaf, Joana Falcao et al.•BMC Public Health•2020

  • High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era

    Open Access•Margaret E Kruk, Anna D Gage et al.•The Lancet Global Health•2018

  • Our fear is finished,” but nothing changes

    Open Access•Marta Schaaf, Jashodhara Dasgupta•BMC Public Health•2019

  • Evaluating the feasibility of the Community Score Card and subsequent contraceptive behavior in Kisumu, Kenya

    Open Access•Dickens Onyango, Dickens Otieno Onyango et al.•BMC Public Health•2022

  • Social participation in health – case studies from primary health care in Kosovo

    Open Access•Ilir Hoxha, Vlora Basha-Berisha et al.•BMC Public Health•2024

  • Community leaders as intermediaries

    Open Access•Elmé Vivier, Diana Sanchez‐Betancourt•Leadership•2020

  • Do community scorecards improve utilisation of health services in community clinics

    Open Access•Syed Manzoor Ahmed Hanifi, Aazia Hossain et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2020

  • Gendered norms of responsibility

    Open Access•Elsbet Lodenstein, Kyra Pedersen et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2018

  • The impact of community and provider-driven social accountability interventions on contraceptive use

    Open Access•Petrus Steyn, Petrus S Steyn et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2023

  • Influence of community scorecards on maternal and newborn health service delivery and utilization

    Open Access•Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho, Noel Namuhani et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2020

  • Impact of community and provider-driven social accountability interventions on contraceptive uptake in Ghana and Tanzania

    Open Access•Petrus Steyn, Petrus S Steyn et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2022

  • Maternal health challenges experienced by adolescents; could community score cards address them? A case study of Kibuku District– Uganda

    Open Access•Rebecca Racheal Apolot, Moses Tetui et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2020

  • Designing for Scale and taking scale to account

    Open Access•Elizabeth Ekirapa Kiracho, Christine Aanyu et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2021

  • Feasibility, acceptability and initial outcome of implementing community scorecard to monitor community level public health facilities

    Open Access•Shehrin Shaila Mahmood, Sabrina Rasheed et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2020

  • Multi-level change strategies for health

    Open Access•Angela C Bailey, Angela Bailey et al.•International Journal for Equity…•2022

  • Improving access to health services through health reform in Lesotho

    Open Access•Melino Ndayizigiye, Lao-Tzu Allan-Blitz et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2022

  • Rethinking integrated service delivery for malaria

    Open Access•Evelyn Ansah, Corrina Moucheraud et al.•PLOS Global Public Health•2022

  • Can social accountability improve access to free public health care for the poor? Analysis of three Health Equity Fund configurations in Cambodia, 2015–17

    Open Access•Bart Jacobs, Sam Sam Oeun et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2020

  • Developing more participatory and accountable institutions for health

    Open Access•Kerry Scott, Nasreen Jessani et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2018

  • From favours to entitlements

    Open Access•Marta Schaaf, Stephanie M Topp et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2017

  • Human resources for health

    Open Access•Lincoln Chen, Timothy Evans et al.•The Lancet•2004

  • Power to the People

    Martina Björkman, J Svensson•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2009

  • The Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives

    Open Access•J Gaventa, Rosemary Mcgee•Development Policy Review•2013

  • Accountability and health systems

    Open Access•Derick W Brinkerhoff•Health Policy and Planning•2004

  • Service accountability and community participation in the context of health sector reforms in Asia

    Open Access•Ranjani K Murthy•Health Policy and Planning•2004

  • Community accountability at peripheral health facilities

    Open Access•Sassy Molyneux, Martin Atela et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2012

  • The Effects of Participatory Budgeting on Municipal Expenditures and Infant Mortality in Brazil

    Open Access•Sónia Gonçalves•World Development•2013

  • Social Accountability

    Open Access•Jonathan Fox, Jonathan A Fox•World Development•2015

  • Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement

    Open Access•J Gaventa, G Barrett•World Development•2012

  • Holding health providers in developing countries accountable to consumers

    Open Access•David Berlan, Joseph Shiffman•Health Policy and Planning•2012

  • Women's Preferences for Place of Delivery in Rural Tanzania

    Margaret E Kruk, Magdalena Paczkowski et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2009

  • Improving Social Well-Being Through New Democratic Institutions

    Open Access•Michael Touchton, B Wampler•Comparative Political Studies•2014

  • Using Accountability to Improve Reproductive Health Care

    Asha George•Reproductive Health Matters•2003

Unique citing works20
Citations per year2.22
Citation span2017 - 2024 (8)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae