The power paradigm in practice
A critical review of developments in the Zambian electricity sector
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 14683035 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kate Bayli (0000-0001-9018-5085, University of Leeds, corresponding author), Kate Bayliss, Gabriel Pollen (University of Zambia) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 140 |
| Pages | 105358 |
| Publication date | 2021-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | World Development (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0305-750X • E-ISSN: 1873-5991 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105358 |
| OpenAlex | W3121535966 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 33 |
Sub-Saharan Africa lags behind the rest of the world in electricity access and consumption. Infrastructure deficiencies are framed in terms of a “financing gap”, with policy oriented around attracting global private capital. Recent calls for increased private infrastructure investment follow three decades of market-oriented sector reforms. This paper explores the way that this standard policy paradigm has unfolded in Zambia. Drawing on the Systems of Provision approach we focus on three core interconnected segments of the electricity system: the performance of the state utility, Zesco; private sector participation and cost-recovery pricing. The paper shows that Zesco has run into major difficulties since 2015 due to a crisis in hydro resources and adverse currency movements. In line with the policy paradigm, the utility has signed up to a number of agreements with international independent power producers (IPPs) to diversify power sources, and tariffs have been raised to improve Zesco’s financial situation. However, closer inspection reveals contradictions, biases and inconsistencies in this standard policy package when applied in practice. Zesco’s acutely debilitating financial position is a relatively recent occurrence. Short-term fluctuations in hydro power, for which intermittent back-up is needed, have instead been addressed with new decades-long contracts for fossil fuel generation. IPPs have provided generous returns for foreign investors but have created long-term, dollar-denominated liabilities for Zesco, contributing to a weakening financial position. Tariffs have been raised but households cannot afford to pay a price that covers Zesco’s increased costs. The proliferation of IPPs appears to have worsened the situation.The paper shows that energy sector policies organised around the entry of private capital are problematic and likely to contribute to a dynamic of unequal global capital accumulation. Greater attention is needed to social equity, with policies oriented around domestic circumstances and the specific challenges faced
Business · Currency · Economic growth · Economics · Electricity · Liberian dollar · Monetary economics · Paradigm shift · Private sector · Electric Power System Optimization · Energy and Environment Impacts · Public-Private Partnership Projects · Finance
Privatization and Alternative Public Sector Reform in Sub-Saharan Africa
Unpacking the Public Private Partnership Revival
The World of Consumption
The electricity crisis in Zambia
From billions to trillions’
Geographic perspectives on development goals
Electricity Liberalisation in Developing Countries
Models, templates and currents
Why do countries emulate each others’ policies? A global study of renewable energy policy diffusion
Political autonomy and resistance in electricity sector liberalization in Africa
Rethinking power and institutions in the shadows of neoliberalism
Africa rising
Whose Africa is rising
Renewable energy in South Africa's minerals-energy complex
Dependency redux
The Political Economy of Investment in Renewable Electricity in Kenya
The Political Economy of Aid for Power Sector Reform
Neoliberal energy transitions in the South
The Political Economy of Energy Transitions
Neopatrimonialism and the Political Economy of Economic Performance in Africa
The Wall Street Consensus
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |